Home Page Election 2019 News Opinion Foreign Policy Politics Policy Legislation Lobbying Hill Life & People Hill Climbers Heard On The Hill Calendar Archives Classifieds
Hill Times Events Inside Ottawa Directory Hill Times Store Hill Times Careers The Wire Report The Lobby Monitor Parliament Now
Subscribe Free Trial Reuse & Permissions Advertising
Log In

British, Canadian attacks show terrorists come in all forms

By Scott Taylor      

It’s impossible to defend against attackers using common items like a car and knife to kill unsuspecting civilians.

Mourners gather at the gates outside the British parliament buildings where flowers lay in memory this week of the police officer, Keith Palmer, who was stabbed to death and four others killed by Khalid Masood on March 22. Photograph courtesy of Les Whittington
Share a story
The story link will be added automatically.

OTTAWA—Last Wednesday’s deadly attack in London was a shocking act of violence resulting in five deaths and around 40 innocent bystanders being injured along the famous Westminster Bridge and on the grounds of the British parliament buildings. It was also immediately deemed an act of terrorism and the Western world sent messages of solidarity to Britain in our common fight against radical Islam.

The weapons employed by Khalid Masood were nothing more than a rental SUV, two knives, and his own fanatical beliefs. Masood drove through a crowd of pedestrians on the famous bridge and was in the process of stabbing a policeman to death when he was fatally shot by Metropolitan Police bodyguards for the defence minister.

In the hours following the tragedy, Daesh evildoers (from the militant group also known as ISIS, ISIL, and Islamic State) announced that Masood was acting upon their recent call for radicalized Muslims to rise up in Western countries. There is no evidence that Masood was an actual Daesh foot-soldier or that he ever had direct contact with that group, but Daesh’s claim of responsibility for the attack was good enough for the news media to grant the group what it sought: to spread the unfounded myth that Daesh is everywhere and able to strike us on home soil at any time.

For the record, Khalid Masood was born in Britain in 1964 and the name he used to go by is Adrian Russell Ajao. By his late teens, he had embarked upon a lifetime of violent crime and later converted to Islam. He is the quintessential homegrown nut-job who just proved to us once again that no matter what security measures we take against terrorism, there is no possible defence against suicidal attackers using such common items as a car and a knife to kill unsuspecting civilians.

Since Masood ended up being gunned down in front of the parliament buildings, Canadians naturally drew a parallel to the Oct. 22, 2014 attack in Ottawa by homegrown terrorist Michael Zehaf-Bibeau. Like Masood, Zehaf-Bibeau was a lifetime criminal. He was a drug addict who shot and killed Corporal Nathan Cirillo at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier memorial before launching his solo charge into the Parliament Buildings. Like Masood, Zehaf-Bibeau was gunned down by security guards. There was no evidence that Zehaf-Bibeau had ever been in direct contact with Daesh, and even those evildoers claimed only that their movement had inspired the suicidal rampage of violence in Ottawa.

That incident was nonetheless rightfully declared an act of terrorism, as was the deliberate vehicular manslaughter of a Canadian soldier, Warrant Officer Patrice Vincent, in Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu two days prior to Zehaf-Bibeau’s attack.

That attack was also perpetrated by a homegrown nut-job, Martin Couture-Rouleau, who had tried to head to the Middle East, presumably to join Daesh, but who was instead stopped by Canadian authorities. After killing Vincent and injuring another soldier with his car, Couture-Rouleau was involved in a high-speed chase with Quebec police. After losing control of his vehicle and rolling into a ditch, Couture-Rouleau was shot as he exited the damaged car.

The standard line in labelling those two incidents as acts of terror was that Cpl. Cirillo and Warrant Officer Vincent were targeted because of the uniform they wore and, in turn, what that uniform symbolizes.

Conversely, this year we had a mass shooting at a mosque in Quebec City on the evening of Jan. 29. In that attack, six people were killed and another 19 wounded by lone gunman Alexandre Bissonnette. Following his arrest, Bissonnette was charged with six counts of first-degree murder, but not an act of terrorism. Legal experts opined that it would be difficult for Crown attorneys to prove that this case met the criteria for a terrorist act under the Criminal Code of Canada.

How is that possible? These people were gunned down in their place of worship, while observing their religious faith. What could be more symbolic than that?

To be fair, both Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Quebec Premier Philippe Couillard did label the mosque shooting as an act of terror, but those words are hollow when our courts do not apply the law evenly.

I’m sure the victims who were in the mosque that night were just as terrified as the innocent bystanders on the Westminster Bridge last Thursday. Terrorists come in all colours.

Scott Taylor is editor and publisher of Esprit de Corps magazine.

The Hill Times

Politics This Morning

Get the latest news from The Hill Times

Politics This Morning

Your email has been added. An email has been sent to your address, please click the link inside of it to confirm your subscription.

McKenna wins re-election in Ottawa Centre, trumpets voters’ support for climate fight

News|By Neil Moss
'I’m so relieved,' Catherine McKenna said, about continuing with the Liberal climate change plan.

Election 2019 was a ‘campaign of fear,’ say pollsters

'There may well be a message to this to the main parties, that slagging each other will only take you so far,' says Greg Lyle.

Election 2019 campaign one of the most ‘uninspiring, disheartening, and dirtiest’ in 40 years, says Savoie

News|By Abbas Rana
Green Party Leader Elizabeth May says she has never seen an election where mudslinging overwhelmingly dominated the campaign, leaving little or no time for policy discussion.

Strategic voting to determine if Liberals will form government, say political players

News|By Abbas Rana
As many as nine per cent of progressive voters could vote strategically in this close election potentially affecting the outcome in more than 100 ridings, says Innovative Research president Greg Lyle.

Turkish offensive should pressure feds to act on repatriation of Canadian citizens in Kurdish-controlled ISIS detention camps, says expert

News|By Neil Moss
The issue of repatriation will be less politically fraught after the election, says expert.

Business tops experience among 2019 candidates, one-third have run for office before

Here’s an analysis of the record 1,700-plus candidates running for the six major parties this election.

Pod save us all: the growing role of political podcasts in election 2019

News|By Mike Lapointe
The Hill Times spoke with some podcast hosts taking a deeper dive into the political nitty-gritty, within a medium that only continues to grow in popularity.

No-shows from Conservative candidate could hurt party’s chances in tight Kanata-Carleton race, say politicos

News|By Palak Mangat
The Conservative's candidate, Justin McCaffrey, has skipped two events, including a debate on the environment, intended to feature all candidates.

For whom will the bell toll in Peterborough-Kawartha?

In a riding where voters are deeply engaged in the political process, candidates avoid the low-hanging fruit and stay out of the mud as they grapple with who to send to the House of Commons.
Your group subscription includes premium access to Politics This Morning briefing.