Saturday, May 17, 2025

Canada’s Politics and Government News Source Since 1989

Saturday, May 17, 2025 | Latest Paper

TRENDING:

There is no path to net-zero without forests

As our first line of defence against greenhouse gas emissions, trees are also a powerful natural and proven carbon sequestration technology.

Opinion
BY GARY ZED
June 29, 2022

Opinion | BY GARY ZED | June 29, 2022

FOLLOW THE HILL TIMES:

Want to make sure your whole office has the full Hill Times experience?

We have team plans available for companies, organizations, classes, Parliament Hill offices and more. Fill out this form and find out if your team is eligible for a discount.

More Opinion

Canadians need an urgent privacy reform

OpinionBY FLORIAN MARTIN-BARITEAU

Polls, the campaign, and Pierre Poilievre

OpinionBY NELSON WISEMAN

Is Canada’s electric vehicle industry on a collision course?

OpinionBY JOSEPH FOURNIER

Message to Foreign Minister Anand: build doctrine, not optics

OpinionBY BHAGWANT SANDHU

Readying the country to ‘defend against help’

OpinionBY JAMIE CARROLL, PHILIPPE LAGASSé, TIM PAGE

Related Stories

New Liberal cabinet’s early stumbles all part of growing pains, say politicos

NewsBY IREM KOCA

‘When we hear government efficiency from Carney, we’re worried we’ll see DOGE-lite’: public service unions react to new ministers Lightbound and Ali

NewsBY MARLO GLASS

Mr. Carney goes to Rome

FeatureBY PETER MAZEREEUW, RIDDHI KACHHELA, STUART BENSON

Meet Mark Carney’s 38-member senior team

ListBY SAMANTHA WRIGHT ALLEN

Former top bureaucrat Jocelyne Bourgon calls for bold public service reform to match Carney’s economic plan

NewsBY KATHRYN MAY

In politics, a ‘near victory’ is a defeat

OpinionBY KEN POLK

Why did so many voters conclude that it was more important to stop Pierre Poilievre than to deny the Liberals a rare 'four-peat?' How can they win if federal politics are indeed a two-horse race for at least the near future?

In politics, a ‘near victory’ is a defeat

OpinionBY KEN POLK

Why did so many voters conclude that it was more important to stop Pierre Poilievre than to deny the Liberals a rare 'four-peat?' How can they win if federal politics are indeed a two-horse race for at least the near future?