Get The Foreign Policy Newsletter
The key issues and people influencing Canadian foreign policy and diplomacy. Thursday.
By entering your email address you consent to receive email from The Hill Times containing news, analysis, updates and offers. You may unsubscribe at any time. See our privacy policy
FOLLOW THE HILL TIMES:
Want to make sure your whole office has the full Hill Times experience?
We have team plans available for companies, organizations, classes, Parliament Hill offices and more. Fill out this form and find out if your team is eligible for a discount.
More Opinion
Related Stories
- Doing our share to contribute to collective security and global stability benefits Canada and Canadians.
- Doing our share to contribute to collective security and global stability benefits Canada and Canadians.
- Multi-partisan consensus on matters of national security would ensure continuity, predictable funding, and an altogether more functional approach to how it engages in the world.
- Multi-partisan consensus on matters of national security would ensure continuity, predictable funding, and an altogether more functional approach to how it engages in the world.
- March 29 marked 20 years since Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia joined NATO And as the alliance celebrates its 75th anniversary on April 4, it is key to protect that united front, say a group of ambassadors to Canada.
- March 29 marked 20 years since Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia joined NATO And as the alliance celebrates its 75th anniversary on April 4, it is key to protect that united front, say a group of ambassadors to Canada.
- To date, no NATO country has suffered an armed attack against it, and thankfully, Article 5 of the charter has not been put to the test.
- To date, no NATO country has suffered an armed attack against it, and thankfully, Article 5 of the charter has not been put to the test.
- Using a percentage of GDP to measure military readiness of nations is not an accurate method to gage the contribution of NATO members. This approach is meaningless as an expression of military effectiveness of nations and is certainly not an indicator of burden sharing or defence capabilities.
- Using a percentage of GDP to measure military readiness of nations is not an accurate method to gage the contribution of NATO members. This approach is meaningless as an expression of military effectiveness of nations and is certainly not an indicator of burden sharing or defence capabilities.
- Politics
- Foreign Policy
- Lobbying
- Legislation
- Policy Briefings
- Politics This Morning
- Hill Climbers
- Civil Circles
- Heard On The Hill
- Election
- Finance and Budget
- Public Service
- Exclusive Lists
- Parliamentary Calendar
- Top 100 Lists and Exclusive Features
- Podcasts
- This Week's Paper
- Search
- Archives
- Digital Newspaper Archives
- Politics
- Foreign Policy
- Lobbying
- Legislation
- Policy Briefings
- Politics This Morning
- Hill Climbers
- Civil Circles
- Heard On The Hill
- Election
- Finance and Budget
- Public Service
- Exclusive Lists
- Parliamentary Calendar
- Top 100 Lists and Exclusive Features
- Podcasts
- This Week's Paper
- Search
- Archives
- Digital Newspaper Archives
-
Get free news updates