Friday, July 18, 2025

Canada’s Politics and Government News Source Since 1989

Friday, July 18, 2025 | Latest Paper

TRENDING:

Moving at the speed of government not good enough in lobster dispute

Editorial
October 21, 2020

Editorial | October 21, 2020

FOLLOW THE HILL TIMES:

Want to make sure your whole office has the full Hill Times experience?

We have team plans available for companies, organizations, classes, Parliament Hill offices and more. Fill out this form and find out if your team is eligible for a discount.

More Opinion

Proposed budget cuts echo Trump’s priorities, not our own

OpinionBY DAVID MACDONALD

Before the cuts: a bureaucracy baseline from an employment equity lens

OpinionBY ANDREW GRIFFITH

Canada Post being used to traffic drugs to First Nations in crisis

OpinionBY MICHAEL YELLOWBACK, ANGELA LEVASSEUR

Buying time for Ukraine

OpinionBY GWYNNE DYER

While Carney negotiates with a lawless president, opposition armchair critics should give the prime minister more room to manoeuvre

OpinionBY ERROL MENDES

Related Stories

Ministers update public on wildfires

FeatureBY RIDDHI KACHHELA, PETER MAZEREEUW

Feds’ new ‘reciprocal procurement’ policy to limit foreign access to contracts amid U.S. trade tensions

NewsBY IREM KOCA

The PBO’s take on public service bloat and staffing cuts

NewsBY RIDDHI KACHHELA

Competition Bureau recommends bureaucratic power grab over airline industry

OpinionBY MATTHEW LAU

Carney vs. the chiefs

FeatureBY PETER MAZEREEUW, RIDDHI KACHHELA

‘It’s a massive task’: Carney’s ethics screen won’t prevent conflicts of interest, warn critics

NewsBY ELEANOR WAND

One expert says there is ‘no way’ for the prime minister ‘to not be in conflict,’ emphasizing that the path ahead is being transparent about how conflicts of interest will be mitigated, not trying to remove them altogether.

‘It’s a massive task’: Carney’s ethics screen won’t prevent conflicts of interest, warn critics

NewsBY ELEANOR WAND

One expert says there is ‘no way’ for the prime minister ‘to not be in conflict,’ emphasizing that the path ahead is being transparent about how conflicts of interest will be mitigated, not trying to remove them altogether.