Home Page Election 2019 News Opinion Foreign Policy Politics Policy Legislation Lobbying Hill Life & People Hill Climbers Heard On The Hill Calendar Archives Classifieds
Hill Times Events Inside Ottawa Directory Hill Times Store Hill Times Careers The Wire Report The Lobby Monitor Parliament Now
Subscribe Free Trial Reuse & Permissions Advertising
Log In

Kenney, Ford to spend $60-million on PR war against Trudeau’s carbon tax, and that ain’t right

By Michael Harris      

Canada’s chief electoral officer says that what Kenney and Ford are doing is okay because the activities of provincial governments, including advertising campaigns, aren’t subject to the Canada Elections Act. Democracy could disappear through this loophole.

Alberta Premier Jason Kenney and Alberta Energy Minister Sonya Savage, pictured on May 2, 2019, scrumming after the Senate Committee on Energy, the Environment and Natural Resources on Bill C-69. Mr. Kenney, whose head has gone up several hat sizes since crushing Rachel Notley in the recent Alberta election, will be travelling to Ontario to woo immigrant voters back to the Tory fold on Andrew Scheer’s behalf, writes Michael Harris. The Hill Times photograph by Andrew Meade
Share a story
The story link will be added automatically.

HALIFAX—So now premiers Jason Kenney and Doug Ford plan to actively campaign in the 2019 federal election.

Kenney, whose head has gone up several hat sizes since crushing Rachel Notley in the recent Alberta election, will be travelling to Ontario to woo immigrant voters back to the Tory fold on Andrew Scheer’s behalf.

It is not yet known if Mr. Curry-in-a-Hurry has lost his touch with new Canadians. Kenney, who organized the immigrant vote for Stephen Harper in the federal party’s glory days, wasn’t much help in the 2015 election when Trudeau swept the GTA, ousting a slew of Conservative incumbents in the process.

More than that, Kenney will be spending $30-million of Alberta taxpayer money to conduct a public relations war against the Trudeau government’s carbon tax, critics of the tar sands and environmentalists. His political cousin, Premier Doug Ford, will be doing the same thing in Ontario—pumping $30-million of taxpayers money into an anti-carbon tax campaign aimed at bringing Trudeau down.

In Ford’s case, he has carried the dirty work a little further. His government introduced legislation requiring every gas station in the province to place government-issued anti-carbon tax stickers on their pumps. If they don’t endorse this blatant piece of partisan politicking, they face fines of up to $10,000 a day. What’s next, Ford’s face on the pumps holding up his fist?

The proposed stickers do not mention that the federal government will be returning the lion’s share of the revenues collected under the carbon tax to consumers. As always, a half-truth is a lie.

No one should be surprised at such underhandedness. The modern day Conservative Party has always found ways to get around the rules governing elections. Or to cheat, depending on your sensibilities.

While he worked for the National Citizens Coalition, Stephen Harper went the legal route to do away with third-party spending limits during an election. He lost that case, when the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that spending limits during an election were constitutional.

In the 2006 election, the Conservatives broke the rules on election spending in the so-called In-and Out-scandal.

The CPC transferred money from the party’s national coffers into the accounts of local campaigns. Then the local campaigns returned the money to the central party.

That meant that the national party could exceed national spending limits on advertising (by a cool million dollars in 2006), and the local campaigns could claim a 60 per cent rebate on the funds they had briefly been given but never used.

Fives years later, four senior members of the Conservative Party were charged under the Canada Elections Act. In March 2012, the charges were dropped against these individuals. In return, the CPC’s fundraising arm pled guilty to overspending in the 2006 campaign, and attempting to fraudulently gain nearly a million dollars from taxpayers. The party was fined $230,000.

In the 2008 election, Stephen Harper’s parliamentary secretary and ethics spokesman Dean Del Mastro was caught cheating during an election. He was convicted of three offences: overspending on his campaign; failing to report a personal contribution of $21,000; and filing a false report to Elections Canada. For that, he served one month in jail and three months under house arrest.

In 2013, Harper’s intergovernmental affairs minister, Peter Penashue, resigned over spending irregularities in his 2011 campaign for re-election. He lost his bid for re-election.

But the elephant story of the 2011 federal election was the Robocalls Scandal, the biggest unsolved political crime in Canadian history. Someone tried to steal a federal election in 261 ridings.

Federal Court Judge Richard Mosley found that “widespread” voter suppression had taken place in at least six federal ridings. Although he didn’t name the Conservative Party per se, the judge called it a “concerted campaign” by a person or persons who had access to the constituent information management system (CIMS) database, which just happens to be controlled by the CPC.

And even in the convention that selected Andrew Scheer as Stephen Harper’s successor, several Conservative candidates accused each other of cheating.

Kevin O’Leary for one accused unnamed fellow candidates of mass voter fraud.

Maxime Bernier, who has since left the Conservatives to found his own party, accused O’Leary of vote buying.

A hasty investigation by party officials of Bernier’s charge led to 1,351 fraudulent memberships being thrown out.

Bernier was still troubled, wondering if the CPC had fudged the vote count that led to Scheer’s razor-thin victory. Hard to tell. The accounting firm Deloitte never actually certified the count, but merely observed the counting process. Chief returning officer David Filmon destroyed the ballots immediately after the vote.

Whether you call it cheating, dirty pool, or the new politics, there is the distinct odour of decomposing fish in what Kenney and Ford have planned.

True, premiers have helped or opposed parties in past federal elections, but not with the taxpayers’ chequebook. Surely the place for Kenney to campaign against Justin Trudeau is in Alberta, not Ontario. What business does Kenney have working the streets of the GTA when his jurisdiction is thousands of kilometres away?

Will Ontario voters appreciate the intrusion? Will Alberta voters appreciate the time their premier is taking off from his job to campaign in another province?

In Ford’s case, if he wants to inform voters about the carbon tax, why put half the story on his gas pump stickers? Until he adds the other half, the part about the carbon tax rebate and who gets it, the stickers are just more fake information.

But the real problem with what Kenney and Ford are doing is what it always is with Conservatives at election time—the money. In this case, we are talking about $60-million of potential propaganda against the Trudeau Liberals. That is a large enough sum to skew the playing field in election 2019, maybe even change the government.

Once again, the Office of the Commissioner of Canada Elections has missed the point of what is happening here, just as it did when it prematurely closed the robocalls investigation before getting to the bottom of that fraud.

Scheer has just received a $60-million windfall that would never be allowed if Kenney and Ford were treated like any other third party during an election. They would have to register with Elections Canada, report their contributions, and be subject to spending limits. They could never spend that amount of cash helping Scheer.

Canada’s Chief Electoral Officer, Stéphane Perrault, says that what Kenney and Ford are doing is okay. Why? Because the activities of provincial governments, including advertising campaigns, aren’t subject to the Canada Elections Act.

That is a loophole through which a democracy could disappear.

Correction: This column incorrectly reported that Elections Canada had missed the point on what was happening here and prematurely closed the robocalls investigation, but it’s the Office of the Commissioner of Canada Elections, not Elections Canada that’s responsible for this. This has been corrected. 

Michael Harris is an award-winning journalist and author. 

The Hill Times 

Explore, analyze, understand
You Might Be From Canada If…
You Might Be From Canada If . . . is a delightful, illustrated romp through this country as it celebrates its 150th birthday.

Get the book
Inside Ottawa Directory – 2019 Edition
The handy reference guide includes: riding profiles, MPs by province, MP contact details, both Hill and constituency and more.

Get the book
Spinning History: A Witness to Harper’s Canada and 21st Century choices
An unvarnished look at the Harper years and what lies ahead for Canadians

Get the book

Politics This Morning

Get the latest news from The Hill Times

Politics This Morning

Your email has been added. An email has been sent to your address, please click the link inside of it to confirm your subscription.

McKenna wins re-election in Ottawa Centre, trumpets voters’ support for climate fight

News|By Neil Moss 1:05 AM ET
'I’m so relieved,' Catherine McKenna said, about continuing with the Liberal climate change plan.

Election 2019 was a ‘campaign of fear,’ say pollsters

'There may well be a message to this to the main parties, that slagging each other will only take you so far,' says Greg Lyle.

Election 2019 campaign one of the most ‘uninspiring, disheartening, and dirtiest’ in 40 years, says Savoie

News|By Abbas Rana
Green Party Leader Elizabeth May says she has never seen an election where mudslinging overwhelmingly dominated the campaign, leaving little or no time for policy discussion.

Strategic voting to determine if Liberals will form government, say political players

News|By Abbas Rana
As many as nine per cent of progressive voters could vote strategically in this close election potentially affecting the outcome in more than 100 ridings, says Innovative Research president Greg Lyle.

Turkish offensive should pressure feds to act on repatriation of Canadian citizens in Kurdish-controlled ISIS detention camps, says expert

News|By Neil Moss
The issue of repatriation will be less politically fraught after the election, says expert.

Business tops experience among 2019 candidates, one-third have run for office before

Here’s an analysis of the record 1,700-plus candidates running for the six major parties this election.

Pod save us all: the growing role of political podcasts in election 2019

News|By Mike Lapointe
The Hill Times spoke with some podcast hosts taking a deeper dive into the political nitty-gritty, within a medium that only continues to grow in popularity.

No-shows from Conservative candidate could hurt party’s chances in tight Kanata-Carleton race, say politicos

News|By Palak Mangat
The Conservative's candidate, Justin McCaffrey, has skipped two events, including a debate on the environment, intended to feature all candidates.

For whom will the bell toll in Peterborough-Kawartha?

In a riding where voters are deeply engaged in the political process, candidates avoid the low-hanging fruit and stay out of the mud as they grapple with who to send to the House of Commons.
Your group subscription includes premium access to Politics This Morning briefing.