Home Page Election 2019 News Opinion Foreign Policy Politics Policy Legislation Lobbying Hill Life & People Hill Climbers Heard On The Hill Calendar Archives Classifieds
Hill Times Events Inside Ottawa Directory Hill Times Store Hill Times Careers The Wire Report The Lobby Monitor Parliament Now
Subscribe Free Trial Reuse & Permissions Advertising
Log In
Global

We should keep doors open and continue dialogue with China

By David Crane       

Justin Trudeau appears to have consigned his euphoric new relationship with China into the dustbin. But if Andrew Scheer wins, the outlook could be even worse given his embrace of the Trump administration’s economic war with China.

Share a story
The story link will be added automatically.

TORONTO—October 2020 will mark the 50th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic ties between Canada and China? But will there be a celebration party? At present, it seems highly unlikely.

If Prime Minister Justin Trudeau wins re-election this fall, given the breakdown of relations that are based in part on his own costly miscalculations, it certainly is doubtful. It would take, at the very least, freeing Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou and allow Huawei itself to be a supplier on Canada’s 5G infrastructure. But Trudeau appears to have consigned his much-promised and euphoric new relationship with China into the dustbin.

If Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer wins, the outlook could be even worse given his embrace of the Trump administration’s economic war with China, as set out in his recent foreign policy speech. Scheer says China is a huge threat and says it wants to dominate the world in the 21st century though if any country wants to dominate it is much more likely to be the U.S.

How different things were when the two countries celebrated the 40th anniversary of diplomatic relations in 2010. Then-prime minister Stephan Harper was in Beijing where he declared, with then-Chinese premier Wen Jiabao at his side, that, “today, the relationship between our two dynamic nations is flourishing, with more trade, more people-to-people links and more cooperation on a wide variety of issues than ever before,” adding that, “as we move forward to a new era of partnership, we should cooperate for even stronger relations.”

While Harper, after becoming prime minister in 2006, had launched into an unnecessary public feud with China that put relations into a deep freeze, he eventually recognized that Canada could not ignore a country that was destined to become the world’s largest economy, with the world’s fastest-growing middle-class consumer market. Scheer, however, seems prepared to pursue a politically opportunistic, short-term policy on China, risking Canada’s significant longer-term interests.

In his recent foreign policy speech, Scheer blamed Trudeau for difficulties with China. But the speech also showed that Scheer has no solution to current impasses with China, ranging from the questionable imprisonment of two Canadians to the suspension of shipments of canola.

There is plenty of room for legitimate criticism over Trudeau’s broader mishandling of the China file, but the current difficulties are the direct outcome of Canada’s decision to accede to a U.S. request for extradition of Huawei executive Meng, with her arrest in Vancouver. Does Scheer think we should have warned Meng off before she arrived, as some argue, since Canada was not a party to the U.S. Iran sanctions?

A Scheer government would ban Huawei from participating in Canada’s 5G infrastructure without waiting for the report from Canada’s cybersecurity experts and ignoring the fact that British and German experts have concluded that Huawei technology can be safely used in their 5G networks. Both Bell Canada and Telus have good working relationships with Huawei and would like to use its technology.

A Scheer government would also withdraw Canada from the multilateral Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, ignoring the fact that countries such as Germany, Britain, France, Sweden, Israel, Korea, and Australia see benefits in being members. The Harper government, under pressure from the U.S., decided against joining but the Trudeau government did join, allocating $265-million over five years, arguing this would increase the opportunity for Canadian companies to join in projects.

Not only would a Scheer government rule out the pursuit of a free trade or major trade enhancement agreement. It would go further, depicting China as a threat to “Canadian security and prosperity in the 21st century” and demanding major changes within China before any serious resumption of normal relations.

Scheer rejected looking to China as a way to diversify trade and reduce dependence on the U.S., declaring China’s policies meant that “we have no other choice as Canadians but to consider other trading partners.”

There is plenty of room to criticize the Trudeau government’s handling of the China relationship. Prime Minister Trudeau never devised an all-of-government, long-term China strategy, which set out the relationship the government sought. We needed a China strategy white paper. Instead, policy seemed to be opportunistic, built around the idea of promoting Trudeau as a fresh new face “restarting” the relationship, as a kind of celebrity politician.

But Trudeau failed to recognize his own lack of experience in dealing with an experienced Chinese leadership. And much of his focus in talking trade with China was on his “progressive” trade policy with chapters on labour, feminism, and so forth that seemed directed more at Canadian audiences rather than with seriously engaging the Chinese.

It was never clear what Trudeau wanted in a free trade agreement—was it something like the Australian agreement? Or something else? His government also talked about sectoral free trade agreements with China, but these are not permitted on a bilateral basis by the World Trade Organization.

Now we are stuck and Canada could be the big loser as China looks elsewhere. There are legitimate reasons for raising human rights issues with China. Canadians expect it and the Chinese know we have to do it. But we also need to recognize that China is trying to compress into decades what the West took centuries to accomplish in building the institutions for the rule of law and democratic institutions, and do this in a country of 1.3 billion people.

China today is a much more open society than it was 25 years ago. And Chinese are now free to travel and study abroad and see how others live just as trade and investment have opened Chinese eyes as to how market economies function.

It would be a huge mistake to erect walls now to contain China. We should want to keep doors open and continue dialogue, despite all the difficulties. It is possible, and desirable, to have a productive relationship with China despite our differences, but that requires a serious leadership that seem to be lacking.

David Crane can be reached at crane@interlog.com.

The Hill Times 

Explore, analyze, understand
Inside Ottawa Directory – 2019 Edition
The handy reference guide includes: riding profiles, MPs by province, MP contact details, both Hill and constituency and more.

Get the book
2018 Guide to Lobbyist Gifting Rules
The 2018 Guide to Lobbyist Gifting Rules is the essential resource for your work on federal issues.

Get the book
Related Policy Briefings
Agriculture Policy Briefing
Short and informative analyses on policy challenges that bring background and recommendations to policymakers, journalists and the general public.

Read policy briefing
Defence Policy Briefing
Short and informative analyses on policy challenges that bring background and recommendations to policymakers, journalists and the general public.

Read policy briefing
Biotech Policy Briefing
Short and informative analyses on policy challenges that bring background and recommendations to policymakers, journalists and the general public.

Read policy briefing

Politics This Morning

Get the latest news from The Hill Times

Politics This Morning


Your email has been added. An email has been sent to your address, please click the link inside of it to confirm your subscription.

Nearly 100 new MPs offer new face of Parliament, including 60 in flipped seats

In many ways the incoming Parliament looks quite similar to its predecessor, with 240 returning MPs, the same number of MPs who are Indigenous or a visible minority, and 10 more women.

Rise of advance voting raising questions about impact on, and of, campaigns: experts

Almost 4.8-million Canadians voted at advance polls this year, according to Elections Canada estimates, a roughly 30.6 per cent increase over 2015, accounting for roughly one-quarter of all ballots cast this election.

Watchdog’s proposed minority Parliament rules ‘appalling,’ says legal expert

News|By Mike Lapointe
Democracy Watch says Governor General should speak with all party leaders before deciding who can try forming government, but Emmett Macfarlane says the confidence convention is the linchpin of the parliamentary system.

McKenna may be moved to new cabinet role after four years implementing Grits’ climate policies, say politicos

News|By Neil Moss
Catherine McKenna's 'tenure in environment would have prepared her well for any other kind of responsibility the prime minister may assign,' says former environment minister Jean Charest.

‘They went with what they knew’: Politicos react to Election 43

'If anybody should've won a majority, it should've been Trudeau. He didn't, and it's his to wear,' says CBC columnist Neil Macdonald of the Oct. 21 election results.

‘A clear mandate’: Trudeau wins second term, with voters handing Liberals a minority

News|By Beatrice Paez
Though not improbable, his victory was not inevitable. It brings an end to a nail-biting, gruelling 40-day slog that has exposed deepening rifts across the country.

McKenna wins re-election in Ottawa Centre, trumpets voters’ support for climate fight

News|By Neil Moss
'I’m so relieved,' Catherine McKenna said, about continuing with the Liberal climate change plan.

Election 2019 was a ‘campaign of fear,’ say pollsters

'There may well be a message to this to the main parties, that slagging each other will only take you so far,' says Greg Lyle.

Election 2019 campaign one of the most ‘uninspiring, disheartening, and dirtiest’ in 40 years, says Savoie

News|By Abbas Rana
Green Party Leader Elizabeth May says she has never seen an election where mudslinging overwhelmingly dominated the campaign, leaving little or no time for policy discussion.
Your group subscription includes premium access to Politics This Morning briefing.