Home Page News Opinion Foreign Policy Politics Policy Legislation Lobbying Hill Life & People Hill Climbers Heard On The Hill Calendar Archives Classifieds
Hill Times Events Inside Ottawa Directory Hill Times Books Hill Times Careers The Wire Report The Lobby Monitor Parliament Now
Subscribe Free Trial Reuse & Permissions Advertising
Log In
Opinion

Canada is weak on corporate crime

By Steven Bittle      
Share a story
The story link will be added automatically.

The SNC-Lavalin scandal is not just about Trudeau’s alleged muscling of his former attorney general to play nice with one of Quebec’s biggest employers—it is the harmful endpoint of four decades of privatization, the crafting of laws favouring powerful interests, and the unprecedented power of multinational corporations.

The story so far has been mostly about the politics—who knew what and when and who has done wrong—but it is really about the role the state can and should play in controlling corporations. And to date, the state has done far too little, leaving ordinary people exposed to the harms that result from corporate greed taking precedence over the rule of law.

While it’s important to find out what went on here, the roots of this scandal stem from a series of decisions by different governments over the past four decades to embrace privatization as a means of building public infrastructure and, in the process, ensure companies like SNC-Lavalin became ‘too big to fail’. For instance, P3s (public-private partnerships) are now the norm, meaning the stakes are extremely high for companies looking to secure lucrative contracts involving considerable public monies—a scenario that breeds ‘win-at-all-costs’ corporate cultures fostering bribery and other forms of malfeasance. What’s more, the fact successive governments have championed private enterprise is part of the reason why corporations have become so powerful, able to throw around their influence with relative ease. It’s also why governments find themselves in a contradictory position in facing the prospects of having to discipline the very entities they’ve helped catapult to such prominence.

Another issue requiring deeper scrutiny is Canada’s remediation agreements. For some, they’re an appropriate option for prosecutors in cases where a company admits wrongdoing before it’s uncovered by authorities. Through remediation, a company can plead guilty to an offence, pay a fine and/or enter an agreement to amend their policies and practices to avoid future offending. The logic of this approach is the belief it’s too difficult to investigate and prosecute complex financial crimes. However, Canada’s record of even trying to prosecute serious financial crimes is less than stellar, evidenced by the fact the country still doesn’t have a unified securities regulator and that the introduction of markets fraud legislation in 2003, along with resources to ensure its enforcement, has failed to generate tangible results. It is thus misleading to suggest remediation agreements can help address the difficulties of prosecuting financial corporate crimes when the government has never really seriously undertaken such efforts.

There’s also the issue of ensuring companies follow the conditions set out in remediation agreements. Based on its track record, we can’t really trust companies like SNC-Lavalin to openly and honestly report what they’re up to. And if governments aren’t prepared to regulate corporations adequately in the first place then there’s little chance they’ll be motivated or capable of doing so after the fact. Ensuring compliance with remediation agreements is therefore much more than a technical matter; it strikes at the heart of what it means to hold corporations accountable under the law.

Companies also aren’t prone to come forward to admit wrongdoing unless they have a rogue operative on their hands and/or they believe an offence is about to be exposed. If corporations were so motivated we wouldn’t have witnessed the litany of corporate scandals in recent decades that involved more than the occasional bad actor and wherein company officials failed to stop what was so obviously wrong. Either this situation means companies are rationally choosing to evade the law or they’re so disorganized or out of control that they struggle to operate legally. Regardless, the answer isn’t embracing alternative measures like remediation agreements, but instead to seriously discuss how best to control corporate criminals.

In the end, there exist very real incentives for corporate executives to ignore the law. From this vantage point, the problem isn’t the bad apples scenario we’ve heard so much about but that the barrel itself is rotten. If we’re serious about preventing another SNC-Lavalin from happening again, then we should use this case as the basis for going after bad corporate and state structures, not just an occasion to rain on Justin Trudeau’s promise of sunny politics.

Steven Bittle is an associate professor in the department of criminology at the University of Ottawa. 

The Hill Times 

Related Policy Briefings
Agriculture Policy Briefing
Short and informative analyses on policy challenges that bring background and recommendations to policymakers, journalists and the general public.

Read policy briefing
Agriculture
Short and informative analyses on policy challenges that bring background and recommendations to policymakers, journalists and the general public.

Read policy briefing
Military Procurement Policy Briefing
Short and informative analyses on policy challenges that bring background and recommendations to policymakers, journalists and the general public.

Read policy briefing

Politics This Morning

Get the latest news from The Hill Times

Politics This Morning


Your email has been added. An email has been sent to your address, please click the link inside of it to confirm your subscription.
More in News

All eyes on Red Chamber, as Senators push back on key government bills

Senators have proposed dozens of changes to the Liberals' impact assessment and gun bills, have concerns about its solitary confinement legislation, and recommended its tanker-ban bill not proceed.

House may need to sit in summer to pass new NAFTA deal, says Trade Committee chair

News|By Neil Moss
‘I've never seen that before, but it's doable,’ says Liberal MP Mark Eyking. But MPs still say the Americans should make the first move toward ratification.

Senate on a spending ‘slippery slope,’ says Sen. Marshall, as Senators review office-expense rules

Senators rejected staff-suggested changes to the rules governing how they spend money from their office budgets, in favour of examining the rules and coming up with their own changes.

Lobbying czar has ‘concerns’ for her office’s budget, warns court decision could widen workload

The office’s work has ‘evolved in complexity, litigiousness, and level of scrutiny,’ says Nancy Bélanger.

Conservatives say they’re ‘confident’ Mark Norman will expose more Liberal wrongdoing

Peter MacKay says if Vice-Admiral Mark Norman speaks out about his ordeal, 'I don’t think it will mean good things for the Liberal government.'

Senate compromise on government’s signature impact assessment bill would put maligned regulators back in charge on environmental review panels

Plus, a ban on importing shark fins is now steps away from law.

‘They should be nervous’: Liberals now focusing ‘completely’ on election readiness in regional, national caucus meetings

News|By Abbas Rana
The Liberals will be under attack from all sides in the next election campaign, but Liberals say they have a good story to tell and some say they need to sharpen up their communications strategy before it's too late.

Ford’s cuts in social programs could be opening for federal Liberals to campaign against federal Conservatives in October, say Liberal MPs

News|By Abbas Rana
Conservative MP David Tilson says it’s too early to jump to any conclusion about the impact of the Ford government’s policies on the next federal election outcome.

Remains of old barracks, guardhouse focus of ‘significant’ archaeological dig on Parliament Hill

MPs learned about the archaeological finds through a briefing from officials at the House Affairs Committee last week, during which new details about proposed work plans for Centre Block were shared.
Your group subscription includes premium access to Politics This Morning briefing.