Home Page Election 2019 News Opinion Foreign Policy Politics Policy Legislation Lobbying Hill Life & People Hill Climbers Heard On The Hill Calendar Archives Classifieds
Hill Times Events Inside Ottawa Directory Hill Times Store Hill Times Careers The Wire Report The Lobby Monitor Parliament Now
Subscribe Free Trial Reuse & Permissions Advertising
Log In
Opinion

There is a simple solution: carbon fee and dividend, says reader

Share a story
The story link will be added automatically.

Doug Ford, Scott Moe, Jason Kenney, and Andrew Scheer are right—a carbon tax is not the way to seriously cut emissions. Why? It’s politically and economically untenable for a carbon tax to go as high as it needs to go.

How high does it need to go? The international Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition (yes, Ontario and Alberta are members, along with British Columbia and a who’s-who of Canadian blue-chip business, as well as governments, NGOs, and businesses across the globe) convened a high-level commission in 2017, led by economists Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz and Lord Nicholas Stern, whose key conclusion was this: “Meeting the world’s agreed climate goals in the most cost-effective way while fostering growth requires countries to set a strong carbon price, with the goal of reaching $40-to-$80 per tonne of CO2 by 2020 and $50-to-$100 per tonne by 2030.”

Those would be big-daddy U.S. dollars. Contrast that with the piddly $18 baby Canadian dollars per tonne in the cap and trade market, which may have lost the election for the previous Ontario government. But that government thought it was a good idea to keep the revenue to spend on whatever green thing it wanted.

The government doesn’t need to keep the money for a carbon price to do its work in pricing fossil fuels out of the market. That’s an optional extra (though keeping the money constrains the tax to be ineffectually low).

“It’s not a tax if the government doesn’t keep the money,” said George Shultz, Republican elder statesmen, hardly a leftist eco-nut, but, with his pal Ronald Reagan, one of the architects of the Montreal Protocol, which came along just in time to preserve the ozone layer, which surely earned him enviro-cred to add to his conservative credentials.

And what are our Conservatives planning? Regulations and incentives (a.k.a. subsidies) were mentioned. What’s Conservative about that? Don’t they know ordinary guys like me realize regulations and subsidies create implicit costs for taxpayers? For that matter, what’s Conservative about letting one sector (fossil fuels) get away with freely dumping its waste products, thereby transferring costs and damages to society—socialization of pollution. Where’s the rugged individualism of being financially responsible for one’s own garbage?

There is a simple solution: carbon fee and dividend. It’s not a tax because all the revenue is returned to citizens in the form of dividends, which offsets the increased costs of everything, protects the poor and keeps the economy well lubricated.

John Stephenson

Toronto, Ont.

Explore, analyze, understand
Spinning History: A Witness to Harper’s Canada and 21st Century choices
An unvarnished look at the Harper years and what lies ahead for Canadians

Get the book
2018 Guide to Lobbyist Gifting Rules
The 2018 Guide to Lobbyist Gifting Rules is the essential resource for your work on federal issues.

Get the book
Related Policy Briefings
Agriculture Policy Briefing
Short and informative analyses on policy challenges that bring background and recommendations to policymakers, journalists and the general public.

Read policy briefing
Environment
Short and informative analyses on policy challenges that bring background and recommendations to policymakers, journalists and the general public.

Read policy briefing
Energy: Carbon Pricing Policy Briefing
Short and informative analyses on policy challenges that bring background and recommendations to policymakers, journalists and the general public.

Read policy briefing

Politics This Morning

Get the latest news from The Hill Times

Politics This Morning


Your email has been added. An email has been sent to your address, please click the link inside of it to confirm your subscription.

McKenna wins re-election in Ottawa Centre, trumpets voters’ support for climate fight

News|By Neil Moss
'I’m so relieved,' Catherine McKenna said, about continuing with the Liberal climate change plan.

Election 2019 was a ‘campaign of fear,’ say pollsters

'There may well be a message to this to the main parties, that slagging each other will only take you so far,' says Greg Lyle.

Election 2019 campaign one of the most ‘uninspiring, disheartening, and dirtiest’ in 40 years, says Savoie

News|By Abbas Rana
Green Party Leader Elizabeth May says she has never seen an election where mudslinging overwhelmingly dominated the campaign, leaving little or no time for policy discussion.

Strategic voting to determine if Liberals will form government, say political players

News|By Abbas Rana
As many as nine per cent of progressive voters could vote strategically in this close election potentially affecting the outcome in more than 100 ridings, says Innovative Research president Greg Lyle.

Turkish offensive should pressure feds to act on repatriation of Canadian citizens in Kurdish-controlled ISIS detention camps, says expert

News|By Neil Moss
The issue of repatriation will be less politically fraught after the election, says expert.

Business tops experience among 2019 candidates, one-third have run for office before

Here’s an analysis of the record 1,700-plus candidates running for the six major parties this election.

Pod save us all: the growing role of political podcasts in election 2019

News|By Mike Lapointe
The Hill Times spoke with some podcast hosts taking a deeper dive into the political nitty-gritty, within a medium that only continues to grow in popularity.

No-shows from Conservative candidate could hurt party’s chances in tight Kanata-Carleton race, say politicos

News|By Palak Mangat
The Conservative's candidate, Justin McCaffrey, has skipped two events, including a debate on the environment, intended to feature all candidates.

For whom will the bell toll in Peterborough-Kawartha?

In a riding where voters are deeply engaged in the political process, candidates avoid the low-hanging fruit and stay out of the mud as they grapple with who to send to the House of Commons.
Your group subscription includes premium access to Politics This Morning briefing.