Home Page Election 2019 News Opinion Foreign Policy Politics Policy Legislation Lobbying Hill Life & People Hill Climbers Heard On The Hill Calendar Archives Classifieds
Hill Times Events Inside Ottawa Directory Hill Times Store Hill Times Careers The Wire Report The Lobby Monitor Parliament Now
Subscribe Free Trial Reuse & Permissions Advertising
Log In
Global

How we gonna keep him off of the farm? 

By Susan Riley      

Those who urge Trudeau to jettison the supply management program are wrong. Canada would not be liberating its farmers to conquer the world as its critics claim. We would be putting further distance between what we produce at home and what we consume.

U.S. President Donald Trump, pictured on June 8 arriving at the airport in Bagotville, Que., for the G7 summit. Photograph courtesy of Global Affairs Canada
Share a story
The story link will be added automatically.

CHELSEA, QUE.—Donald Trump is furious—well, acts furious—that Canada imposes tariffs of 270 per cent, and more, on some U.S. dairy products. It is clearly a burr under his saddle; he mentions it frequently. Last week, it featured in his famous Twitter diatribe against Justin Trudeau.
It is an eye-popping number, higher by significant measure than the new U.S. tariffs on Canadian steel (25 per cent) and aluminum (11 per cent), which dropped like a depth charge into NAFTA talks recently and threaten to seriously disrupt a decades-old trading relationship.
Does the president have a point? Is Canada a crafty hypocrite set on, as Trump claims, “hurting our farmers and killing our agriculture” while pleading for exemptions from Trump’s punitive counter-measures on steel, aluminum, autos? No and no. What President Trump does have is an isolated number that presents a damning, but entirely misleading, picture of Canada-U.S. trade—in dairy and overall.
Even Scotiabank, in a recent report, called it “disingenuous” to use one high tariff that “accounts for a tiny fraction of Canada’s $33-billion of U.S. imports a month” to jeopardize a gigantic trading relationship. Annual trade in dairy products amounts to about $750-million of an overall total of $628-billion in cross-border trade. Not only that, Canada imports five times as much dairy-related product from the U.S. as vice versa.
Yes, Canada protects its 12,000, or more, dairy farmers behind high tariff walls. That way, they are not undercut by larger producers to the south and driven out of business as their revenues plummet and farms fail. The much-condemned supply management system works to the same end: by limiting production of eggs, milk, cheese and poultry, it prevents over-production and guarantees Canadian producers stable prices. In as weather dependent and globally exposed a business as agriculture, that is a blessing.

Conservative MP and leadership candidate Maxime Bernier and Andrew Scheer, pictured on May 27, 2017, shortly before Mr. Scheer was elected leader. The Hill Times file photograph 

However, tariffs and supply management both mean higher prices for the Canadian consumer—a constant theme for the sector’s domestic critics—including that friend of the disadvantaged, Conservative MP Maxime Bernier, who was expelled from Andrew Scheer’s caucus last week for continuing to condemn supply management. Bernier is not alone: there is an abiding, almost touching, concern for the well-being of low-income Canadians on the part of right-wing think-tanks, well-heeled lobbyists and free trade purists within Canada. (If only they would apply the same moral fervour to the lack of affordable housing.)
But there is, of course, another side—several, in fact. First, because there are no restrictions on agricultural markets in the U.S., dairy farmers there, especially in Wisconsin, produce too much milk to sell profitably. They end up dumping gallons of excess in fields. Hence the pressure on Trump, and his acolytes, to open the Canadian market to U.S. milk, which would be sold for considerably less than the domestic product.
This could be a temporary win for Canadian consumers—although there are valid questions about the comparative quality of U.S. milk and an elite-led trend towards locally grown produce. But dismantling supply management would undercut Canadian farmers and, ultimately, change the face of rural Ontario and Quebec. It would open suddenly worthless agricultural land to suburban sprawl or replace family operations with corporate agri-business.
To preserve a Canadian dairy industry at all, our governments would have to offer generous support to remaining farmers so, indirectly, we’d all still be on the hook. Indeed, American farmers, far from being the proud independents portrayed by Trump, are massively subsidized by their government. So while Canadian consumers pay more for domestic dairy and poultry, in the U.S. it is taxpayers that keep farms in business through various support programs. By some accounts, some 40 per cent of U.S. farms are subsidized. And there are high tariff walls in the U.S., too, against certain foreign agriculture products including peanuts, sugar, processed fruit and vegetables and other goods.
The small family farm, in particular, is under pressure in both countries; tariffs and support programs are one response and supply management is another—and a comparatively reasonable and effective one. And while the small portion of Canadian agriculture that is protected is a red flag for ideologues, and in every trade negotiation, it has the virtue of working in practise (if not in theory). It makes even less sense to abandon it when every country in the world has its own special departures from free trade gospel.
Supply management, which mostly affects farmers in Quebec and Ontario, also has political champions (along with enemies). These include all federal political parties and most premiers. Many, including Scheer, have backed Trudeau in defending the system in the face of Trump’s provocations. Whatever their private or political qualms, they know several Quebec and eastern Ontario ridings hang in the balance. The pending federal by-election in Chicoutimi probably explains Scheer’s decision to boot Bernier last week; the federal leader doesn’t want to imperil his party’s chances for a rare and welcome win in Quebec by having a high-profile Conservative MP slamming the very system that keeps Quebec dairy flourishing.
Those who urge Trudeau to jettison the program—believing that supply management isn’t worth risking an entire trade deal—are wrong. Canada would not be liberating its farmers to conquer the world as its critics claim—among other things, dairy products don’t always travel well—we would be putting further distance between what we produce at home and what we consume.
Nor would we mollify a president who never lets facts—except for misleading ones—get in the way of a good rant.
Susan Riley is a veteran political columnist who writes regularly for The Hill Times.
The Hill Times 

Explore, analyze, understand
Inside Ottawa Directory – 2019 Edition
The handy reference guide includes: riding profiles, MPs by province, MP contact details, both Hill and constituency and more.

Get the book
2018 Guide to Lobbyist Gifting Rules
The 2018 Guide to Lobbyist Gifting Rules is the essential resource for your work on federal issues.

Get the book
Related Policy Briefings
Agriculture Policy Briefing
Short and informative analyses on policy challenges that bring background and recommendations to policymakers, journalists and the general public.

Read policy briefing
Environment
Short and informative analyses on policy challenges that bring background and recommendations to policymakers, journalists and the general public.

Read policy briefing
Biotech Policy Briefing
Short and informative analyses on policy challenges that bring background and recommendations to policymakers, journalists and the general public.

Read policy briefing

Politics This Morning

Get the latest news from The Hill Times

Politics This Morning


Your email has been added. An email has been sent to your address, please click the link inside of it to confirm your subscription.

Election 2019 campaign one of the most ‘uninspiring, disheartening, and dirtiest’ in 40 years, says Savoie

News|By Abbas Rana
Green Party Leader Elizabeth May says she has never seen an election where mudslinging overwhelmingly dominated the campaign, leaving little or no time for policy discussion.

Strategic voting to determine if Liberals will form government, say political players

News|By Abbas Rana
As many as nine per cent of progressive voters could vote strategically in this close election potentially affecting the outcome in more than 100 ridings, says Innovative Research president Greg Lyle.

Turkish offensive should pressure feds to act on repatriation of Canadian citizens in Kurdish-controlled ISIS detention camps, says expert

News|By Neil Moss
The issue of repatriation will be less politically fraught after the election, says expert.

Business tops experience among 2019 candidates, one-third have run for office before

Here’s an analysis of the record 1,700-plus candidates running for the six major parties this election.

Pod save us all: the growing role of political podcasts in election 2019

News|By Mike Lapointe
The Hill Times spoke with some podcast hosts taking a deeper dive into the political nitty-gritty, within a medium that only continues to grow in popularity.

No-shows from Conservative candidate could hurt party’s chances in tight Kanata-Carleton race, say politicos

News|By Palak Mangat
The Conservative's candidate, Justin McCaffrey, has skipped two events, including a debate on the environment, intended to feature all candidates.

For whom will the bell toll in Peterborough-Kawartha?

In a riding where voters are deeply engaged in the political process, candidates avoid the low-hanging fruit and stay out of the mud as they grapple with who to send to the House of Commons.

Singh’s strong campaign an internal win, whatever the outcome, New Democrats say

Jagmeet Singh’s impressive campaign has ‘rescued’ and ‘refocused’ the NDP after the failed 2015 effort, Ed Broadbent says.

The astrophysicist whose polling aggregator is projecting the election

News|By Neil Moss
The mastermind behind 338Canada, poll aggregator Philippe Fournier, is aiming to correctly call 90 per cent of the seats in the Oct. 21 race.
Your group subscription includes premium access to Politics This Morning briefing.