Home Page Election 2019 News Opinion Foreign Policy Politics Policy Legislation Lobbying Hill Life & People Hill Climbers Heard On The Hill Calendar Archives Classifieds
Hill Times Events Inside Ottawa Directory Hill Times Store Hill Times Careers The Wire Report The Lobby Monitor Parliament Now
Subscribe Free Trial Reuse & Permissions Advertising
Log In
Opinion

Political developments over last 10 days astonishing, but don’t overestimate impact of this moment

By Nancy Peckford      

While the #MeToo movement is shifting the dynamic of who is heard, and potentially believed, when it comes to sexual harassment and assault, the behaviour of elected officials with bad judgment will not magically change overnight.   

This rare and honest discussion about the perversions of politics should be mandatory viewing for all Canadians, including Conservative MP Michelle Rempel’s highly astute deconstruction of what makes Parliament Hill tick. The Hill Time photograph by Andrew Meade
OTTAWA—In an arena defined by power, ego, and the rise and fall of leaders, the political developments over the past 10 days are still astonishing. Patrick Brown, Kent Hehr, and Erin Weir—all confronting unexpected consequences for alleged behaviour. Investigations have been activated, rules are being rewritten. Is it any surprise that heads are spinning, or that panic among certain political operatives has set in as some brace for more? At the same time, however, some are feeling encouraged now that the tables are potentially turning.
The remarkable debate over Labour Minister Patty Hajdu’s very timely Bill C-65—tabled last Monday—is emblematic of the silver lining. Largely led by female MPs from every party, few held back from denouncing a dysfunctional political culture that has often made a mockery of women’s commitment to public service. This rare and honest discussion about the perversions of politics should be mandatory viewing for all Canadians, including Conservative MP Michelle Rempel’s highly astute deconstruction of what makes Parliament Hill tick.
Moreover, for one of the first times, there was a candid airing within, not outside of, the House of Commons regarding the institutional dynamics that can make political spaces, in particular, treacherous. These include: MPs who spend more than half the year away from their families, an endless supply of eager staffers with precarious employment, significant age differences between MPs and their employees,  few human resources protocols, excessive tribalism and party loyalty, as well as a work environment that extends well beyond the office into countless evening receptions, and social and community events.
Unlike many regular workplaces, the lines are constantly blurred, and the conduct of elected officials as employers is rarely scrutinized or meaningfully assessed. Politics is at its core a game of survival, and our collective focus on the major players and their parties has systematically obscured its uncomfortable, and often ugly, underbelly. Parliamentary privilege hasn’t helped either.
But one should not overestimate the impact of this moment. The declarations from many a journalist that this week’s events forever changes how politicians will conduct themselves is far reaching. While no doubt the #MeToo movement is shifting the dynamic of who is heard, and potentially believed, when it comes to sexual harassment and assault,  the behaviour of elected officials with bad judgment will not magically change overnight.
Habits are nothing if not tenacious, and it’s difficult to imagine 338 tee-totalling MPs who dutifully return to their Ottawa apartments every evening and catch up on issue briefs.

The remarkable debate over Labour Minister Patty Hajdu’s very timely Bill C-65—tabled last Monday—is emblematic of the silver lining. The Hill Times photograph by Andrew Meade

A case in point are the endless receptions in Ottawa to which MPs are constantly invited. In addition to a generous supply of alcohol, these events offer valuable contact with stakeholders and others—and the chance for MPs and Senators to burn off some steam outside of school. The constraints of House duty, Question Period, committees and countless lobby and constituent meetings are temporarily suspended. MPs converge across party lines. Sometimes, it has merit.
There is no doubt, however, that a minority of MPs have seized upon these occasions, among others, to imbibe beyond reason, and pursue reckless personal agendas that are inappropriate, damaging, and unbecoming of any elected official who has been sent to Ottawa in good faith. The fact that this behaviour has perennially been dismissed as boys being boys shows you how normalized it is.  That it has taken so long to call anyone to account for it is a sad but predictable commentary on institutionalized and anachronistic (masculine) power.
As Equal Voice has said time and again, Canada’s Parliament was conceived before women had the right to vote. The vestiges of 19th-century conduct and practices loom large over how Parliament continues to function on a day to day basis. The absence of a truly independent process to investigate sexual harassment complaints (pending the passage of Bill 65) is exhibit #1. This clearly must—and will—change.
So should the provisions for maternity leave for female MPs which would enable them to work from their ridings for a short period—with the support of tele/video conferencing. Moreover, the hours and eligibility for kids in the Hill daycare must be modified. Soon, there will two MPs (Niki Ashton and Karina Gould) with three babies under the age of 18 months without access to the childcare centre that was ostensibly established to meet their needs. Except it doesn’t. I’d bet on a fourth baby within a year. No one is saying MPs shouldn’t pay for the services. But at a minimum, they need to be offered.
Further, the proposal for rigorous codes of conduct, as mentioned by Michelle Rempel in the House, needs to be seriously considered. While it is not always evident that parties are the best arbiters of their members’ behaviour and misconduct, crystal clear rules and an explicit commitment by MPs to conduct themselves to meet the highest standard is imperative—or we risk even deeper cynicism about politics and its outcomes.
Finally, we need more women in this House.  Some 27 per cent is not good enough.  Ultimately, cultures don’t change until people do. And part of that formula is compelling parties to actively recruit many more women, and diverse women at that, to contest nominations in competitive ridings. This is not rocket science. It is simple math—and it is not hard.  Ultimately, electing more women is the clarion call.  Without this bigger push towards gender parity in politics, many of the grandiose efforts on display right now are unlikely to stick.
Nancy Peckford is the national spokesperson for Equal Voice.
The Hill Times

Related Policy Briefings
Cannabis
Short and informative analyses on policy challenges that bring background and recommendations to policymakers, journalists and the general public.

Read policy briefing

Politics This Morning

Get the latest news from The Hill Times

Politics This Morning


Your email has been added. An email has been sent to your address, please click the link inside of it to confirm your subscription.

In Speech from the Throne, a nod to Western alienation, promise to enshrine Indigenous rights

News|By Beatrice Paez
'The government has heard Canadians’ concerns that the world is increasingly uncertain, and that the economy is changing,' the Throne Speech read. 'And in this context, regional needs and differences really matter.'

Throne Speech steeped in British parliamentary tradition dating back to at least the 16th century

Feature|By Aidan Chamandy
Queen Elizabeth, on her first royal visit to Canada in 1957, delivered John Diefenbaker's first Throne Speech. In 1977, she delivered Pierre Trudeau's Throne Speech as well in Canada.

Liberals’ Anthony Rota elected Speaker of the House

MPs used a ranked-ballot voting system to elect the new House Speaker.

‘Thou shalt be there,’ government whip tells MPs as high-stakes minority Parliament kicks off Thursday

News|By Palak Mangat
In a minority Parliament, co-operation between parties is now an 'imperative, as opposed to something that we would try to do,' says Chief Government Whip Mark Holland.

‘A servant of the House’: MPs to elect Commons Speaker in early-morning ceremony

News|By Beatrice Paez
Incumbent House Speaker Geoff Regan says he expects MPs will be largely influenced by their peers' assessments of the candidates in casting their ballots for the new Speaker.

Political ties, not diplomatic bona fides needed for next Canadian envoy in D.C., says former ambassador

News|By Neil Moss
‘From a U.S. perspective, the relationship between the ambassador and the prime minister has to be extremely close,’ says Michael Kergin.

‘Let’s get on with the contest now’: chorus of prominent Conservatives calling for Scheer’s ouster continues to grow

News|By Mike Lapointe
But a Conservative source is decrying public criticism of Andrew Scheer's leadership, saying it will only create the kind of schisms that will set the party back and that former leader Stephen Harper worked to avoid.

Parliament security labour standoff nearing end of the road

Long-awaited collective agreements are finally being settled with the unions representing Parliament’s security officers, just in time for a new round of talks.

French envoy defends Macron’s NATO comments as ‘brave’

French ambassador Kareen Rispal says the 29-member alliance is in the midst of a political crisis and her president was recognizing that fact.
Your group subscription includes premium access to Politics This Morning briefing.