Home Page News Opinion Foreign Policy Politics Policy Legislation Lobbying Hill Life & People Hill Climbers Heard On The Hill Calendar Archives Classifieds
Advertising Subscribe Reuse & Permissions
Hill Times Events Hill Times Books Hill Times Careers The Wire Report The Lobby Monitor Parliament Now
News

Plurality of Canadians disapprove of removing Sir John A. Macdonald’s name from building and landmarks; wealthiest most strongly opposed: poll

By Marco Vigliotti      

The random telephone survey of 1,408 Canadian voters by Forum Research found 44 per cent of respondents disapproved of removing the name, while only 33 per cent supported the concept.

Sir John A. Macdonald, Canada's first prime minister, has been both derided as an 'architect of genocide' and praised as one of Canada's founding fathers.
George Lancefield photograph courtesy of Library and Archives Canada

Less than one-third of Canadians support removing the name of the country’s first prime minister Sir John A. Macdonald from schools, museums, and other institutions, according to a new poll from Forum Research, despite renewed criticism over his role in creating the residential school system and advancing discriminatory policies against Indigenous peoples.

The random telephone survey of 1,408 Canadian voters found 44 per cent of respondents disapproved of removing the name from buildings and other landmarks, while only 31 per cent supported the concept.

Another 26 per cent said they neither agreed or disagreed, and one per cent responded that they didn’t know.

The survey results come amid renewed pressure from activists to drop the Sir John A. Macdonald name from public institutions and other facilities because of his role in egregious 19th century policies or actions harmful to Indigenous peoples, including his support of assimilation and creating the residential school system; implementation of the Indian Act; and even the hanging of Métis political leader Louis Riel.

Earlier this month, a Kingston pub that was once home to Mr. Macdonald’s law office changed its name to remove reference to the former prime minister, and the Elementary Teachers Federation of Ontario union is calling for the name to be removed from all schools in the province. 

However, opponents are warning against erasing history, citing the late prime minister’s fundamental role in bringing about Confederation and construction of Canada’s first transcontinental railway. They also say his views aligned with many of his contemporaries, and that he shouldn’t be judged by 21st century values.

Opinion on the appropriateness of maintaining the name appear to be sharply divided in the Forum poll, conducted between Jan. 22 to 24, with 31 per cent strongly disapproving of removing Sir John A. Macdonald from buildings and other landmarks, compared to 16 per cent saying they strongly approve.

Respondents supporting the federal Conservatives (69 per cent), living in Alberta (63 per cent), and those making more than $100,000 (61 per cent) were the mostly likely to voice disapproval to scrapping the name.

Sir John A. Macdonald led the historical Conservative Party of Canada throughout his tenure in office.

Men and older Canadians were also more likely to fall in the opposition camp, with 53 per cent of those in the 45 to 54 age bracket against dropping the name, compared to 55 per cent of men. Fifty-two per cent of respondents holding a university of college degree opposed removing the name.

“The plurality do not approve of stripping Sir John A. Macdonald’s name from buildings or landmarks, with the majority of the wealthiest Canadians vehemently opposed,” Forum Research president Lorne Bozinoff said in a statement, noting that least wealthy Canadians were the only group more likely to approve of dropping the name than disapprove.

According to poll results, NDP supporters (45 per cent), Green Party backers (43 per cent), post-graduate degree holders (40 per cent), Quebecers (40 per cent), and Canadians earning less than $20,000 (36 per cent) were the most likely to support dropping Sir John A’s name.

Afterwards, the demographic and income bands voicing strongest support for shedding the name were Canadians making between $80,000 to $100,000 (35 per cent), those bringing home between between $20,000 to $40,000 (34 per cent), women (34 per cent), and folks making $40,000 to $60,000 in salary (33 per cent).

Meanwhile, 33 per cent of respondents 34 years old and younger approved of the plan, compared to 30 per cent of those in the 35 to 44 age band.

mvigliotti@hilltimes.com

The Hill Times 

More in News

Military activities, veterans’ support, Phoenix fix big-ticket items in $4B new spending ask

News|By Emily Haws
The Department of National Defence and other departments providing services to active and retired members of the Armed Forces are taking up a sizeable chunk of the $4-billion in extra spending the Liberals have put…

Singh will have to showcase ‘political guts,’ clear progressive message to connect with voters

New leader Jagmeet Singh will have to live up to his promise to boldly dig deeper into social democratic values or he'll risk alienating NDP grassroots as the party tries to create distance from the Liberal…

Texting, sit-downs, and lots of waiting in hotel rooms: the ins and outs of NAFTA lobbying

News|By Shruti Shekar
Dozens of industry groups are dispatching executives to every round of the NAFTA renegotiation, and using texts, emails, and phone calls to try to talk to Canada's negotiating leads about what is being discussed with…

Trudeau, Wilson-Raybould justified in speaking out after controversial Stanley verdict, marked a turning point for Canada, say MPs

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould were right to speak out after the verdict in the Gerald Stanley trial, say Liberal and NDP Parliamentarians, who believe the government and Parliament have to…

What happens if an MP’s found guilty of sexual harassment? No one’s saying

News|By Abbas Rana
All the federal political parties say they take sexual harassment “seriously,” but none will say what disciplinary action they would take against an MP found guilty of it. “We take sexual harassment allegations very seriously,…

Feds’ sweeping, new environmental assessment bill keeps power in ministers’ hands, say observers

The government’s new Impact Assessment Act includes hundreds of pages detailing changes to the environmental assessment process in Canada, but keeps ultimate power over approving natural resource projects in the hands of the federal environment…

NDP reviewing past, present harassment processes amid Stoffer, Weir allegations

The NDP isn’t currently investigating the specific harassment allegations against former NDP MP Peter Stoffer, but it says it's looking into how such complaints were, are now and will be handled, something strategist Robin Sears…

Patrick Brown gaining support since re-emerging to challenge sexual harassment allegations, says adviser, though Conservative MPs largely quiet

Patrick Brown, who in a dramatic move re-entered the Ontario leadership late Friday afternoon, is receiving strong support from all corners of the political world since publicly re-emerging to challenge the sexual harassment allegations that…

NDP elects former Hill staffer Vick as new party president

NDP members elected a new party president on the last day of the party’s 2018 policy convention, with former Hill staffer Mathieu Vick being elevated to the role after garnering roughly 83 per cent of…

WANT MORE EXCLUSIVE HILL TIMES CONTENT?

We’re offering 15% off a year-long subscription to the hill times online content.