Home Page Election 2019 News Opinion Foreign Policy Politics Policy Legislation Lobbying Hill Life & People Hill Climbers Heard On The Hill Calendar Archives Classifieds
Hill Times Events Inside Ottawa Directory Hill Times Store Hill Times Careers The Wire Report The Lobby Monitor Parliament Now
Subscribe Free Trial Reuse & Permissions Advertising
Log In
Global

Scariest part of U.S.-North Korea showdown isn’t Kim Jong-un

By Scott Taylor      

It’s worth remembering the only nation to have ever actually used a nuclear bomb against humans is the United States.

Military experts are eager to demonstrate how dangerous North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, right, is. But that doesn't mean U.S. President Donald Trump, left, is safer, writes Scott Taylor. Photographs courtesy of Gage Skidmore and KCNA
Share a story
The story link will be added automatically.

OTTAWA—With all of the fear-mongering going on these days, one could be forgiven for believing we are on the eve of a nuclear Armageddon between North Korea and the United States. Military experts are coming out of the woodwork to take to the airwaves, all of them eager to convince us just how dangerous North Korean leader Kim Jong-un really has become.

Graphic designers have hastily cobbled together detailed diagrams showing all the various ranges of his missile inventory, the latest one clearly showing that Ottawa and Toronto are inside the danger zone.

The usual list of Canadian tub-thumping Colonel Blimps have penned the expected warnings that, although the United States would be the North Korean leader’s intended target, his missiles could inadvertently strike a Canadian city. He aims for Chicago and instead wipes Winnipeg off the map. Scary stuff indeed.

One Canadian fear-monger went so far as to plot out an Austin Powers-worthy scheme wherein Doctor Evil, a.k.a. Kim, is going to use his old 1960s-era Soviet submarine to launch a nuclear torpedo into the U.S. Navy’s facility at Bangor, Washington. That port, located on the Kitsap Peninsula near Seattle, is home to the nuclear-armed Trident submarine fleet.

According to the doomsday theorist, Kim’s nuke will set off the U.S. Navy’s arsenal of nukes and Vancouver will be vaporized. Terrifying stuff!

Even more alarming was the rhetoric used by U.S. President Donald Trump in response to Kim’s threats. The Donald told reporters that if North Korea continues to issue threats, it will be faced with “fire and fury like the world has never seen.” People took this statement to mean that Trump would launch a pre-emptive, massive nuclear strike against North Korea.

This position was foretold in 1999 by then-billionaire-businessman Donald Trump during a television interview on American public affairs program Meet the Press. In that interview Trump said that he would first negotiate with North Korea, if possible, but that time would be running out on that option. Trump would not want to wait “for five years [when there will be North Korean] warheads all over the place pointing at New York City.”

For the record, that would have been in 2004, 13 years ago, and even according to the most exaggerated of the graphic diagrams, New York would have been beyond the reach of Kim’s missiles.

In fact, Kim himself has only threatened to make a demonstration missile fire towards the U.S. military base on the Western Pacific island of Guam. To be clear, the North Korean madman is not suggesting he will actually hit Guam, nor has he said the missile will be armed with any warhead, be it nuclear or conventional.

The threat from North Korea is to land the rocket 30 to 40 kilometres from Guam. It behooves all of those even mildly worried about this current crisis to consult a map showing Guam’s location.

As for all the rumblings about North Korea having successfully miniaturized nuclear warheads and the speculation that Kim already possesses 60 of these miniaturized weapons, keep in mind this information is coming directly from U.S. intelligence agencies.

Yes, that would be the same U.S. intelligence agencies that lied to the world in 2003 about Saddam Hussein possessing weapons of mass destruction in order to justify the United States’ illegal invasion of Iraq. Fool me once…

It would be cool if someone would contract a graphic designer to illustrate the massive U.S. and allied military countermeasures surrounding North Korea.

This infographic should also include the United States’ nuclear arsenal, which includes more than 4,000 warheads that are capable of wiping all of North Korea off the planet, hundreds of times over.

The scariest part of this whole equation is not the goofy-looking Korean with his alleged 60 tiny nukes and a wonky missile program; it is the unstable megalomaniac in possession of the U.S. nuclear launch codes who utters threats of delivering “fire and fury.”

It is worth remembering that the only nation in history to have ever actually employed a nuclear bomb against human beings is the United States. In April of this year, Trump authorized the first use of the Massive Ordinance Air Blast (MOAB or Mother of All Bombs) against targets in Afghanistan; the MOAB is the largest non-nuclear explosive device designed to date.

Let’s hope Trump does not decide to up the ante.

Scott Taylor is editor and publisher of Esprit de Corps magazine.

The Hill Times

Politics This Morning

Get the latest news from The Hill Times

Politics This Morning


Your email has been added. An email has been sent to your address, please click the link inside of it to confirm your subscription.

Wexit ‘absolutely a real thing’ and reaching ‘boiling point’; Parliamentarians need to ‘look for bold and innovative solutions,’ say Conservative MPs

News|By Abbas Rana
Wexit was one of the ‘top of mind’ issues at the Alberta Conservative caucus’ special meeting on Parliament Hill on Nov. 6.

‘If we’re going to sit there and be slinging mud, it’s going to be a long three years,’ says Conservative MP Kusie

News|By Mike Lapointe
Conservative MPs and strategists agree that appointing former Harper cabinet minister John Baird to lead the election post-mortem is the right call. 'He does not hold any punches,' says Conservative MP Stephanie Kusie.

Senate groups scramble for members ahead of committee selection, ex-member calls out ISG ‘group-think’

The Senate leaders will negotiate how to split committee seats and chairs between four Senate groups in the new Parliament, and numbers will matter.

‘Ordered populists’ concentrated among Conservative Party supporters, says pollster Graves

News|By Neil Moss
An authoritarian reflex has yet to make itself felt in Canada as it has south of the border and in Europe.

May calls on Trudeau to attend Madrid climate summit, increase targets

News|By Beatrice Paez
The Greens' Elizabeth May says her three-member caucus isn’t prepared to back any confidence motions unless Canada adjusts its climate targets.

Election 2019: where parties posted their worst 25 results

The Conservatives and NDP had their poorest returns in Quebec, the Liberals had biggest losses in Alberta, and the Green Party shared their lowest count between Alberta, Quebec, and Saskatchewan.

NDP ready ‘any time’ for election if party goals not met, Singh says

News|By Palak Mangat
'We know that the government is going to need our support at some level if they want to pass bills,' he said. 'That’s not going to come for free.'

Updated: Senator Diane Bellemare joins Independent Senators Group after leaving role on government team in Red Chamber

Implementation of new NAFTA will be ‘important priority’ for Liberal government as U.S. negotiations progress

News|By Neil Moss
The U.S. chair of the House Agricultural Committee says he thinks the USMCA will be brought to the floor for a vote by the end of year.
Your group subscription includes premium access to Politics This Morning briefing.