Home Page News Opinion Foreign Policy Politics Policy Legislation Lobbying Hill Life & People Hill Climbers Heard On The Hill Calendar Archives Classifieds
Hill Times Events Inside Ottawa Directory Hill Times Store Hill Times Careers The Wire Report The Lobby Monitor Parliament Now
Subscribe Free Trial Reuse & Permissions Advertising
Log In
News

Liberals won’t commit to meeting platform promises on transparency by next election

By Peter Mazereeuw      

Conservative MPs called for the Treasury Board president to explain the delay on access to information reform to the House Ethics Committee, but were voted down by the committee's Liberal majority.

The 'objectivity' of the federal public service is top of mind for the government as it draws up its plan to make government information more accessible to the public, says Treasury Board President Scott Brison. The Hill Times photograph by Jake Wright
Share a story
The story link will be added automatically.

The government’s lead on Access to Information Act reform isn’t making any promises to change the law before Canadians go to the polls again in 2019.

Treasury Board President Scott Brison (Kings-Hants, N.S.) wouldn’t commit to completing before the next election the changes to Canada’s access to information regime that the government has promised—including opening up ministers’ offices to access to information requests and completing a review of the Access to Information Act—in a brief interview with The Hill Times on March 26.

Mr. Brison didn’t directly confirm or deny if he would keep the promises before the election. Instead, he repeated the rationale given to the Canadian Press last week, which quoted a statement from Mr. Brison’s office saying changes to the government transparency regime would be postponed without a timeline for completion, to allow time to “get it right.”

“We are moving forward to modernize the act, but again, we will get it right by ensuring that we take into account the privacy of Canadians, the independence of the judiciary, and the work of the public service in terms of its objectivity,” Mr. Brison told The Hill Times.

However, Mr. Brison’s office, via a written statement, did recommit to a two-stage approach to overhauling Canada’s access to information regime, including “initial legislative changes” as well as a formal review in 2018. Mr. Brison’s office did not clarify whether the legislative changes would be completed before next year’s review, or if the review would be finished prior to the election.

Despite orders from Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to make government information “open by default,” Canada’s access to information regime is under fire from multiple sides. Parliamentarians are still complaining that they are being denied access to government documents and data. The number of total access to information requests is rising year over year, and the number of complaints over slow responses to requests, or improperly redacted or withheld documents, is rising along with it. The Office of the Information Commissioner, which manages those complaints, is unlikely to clear a backlog of complaints despite a temporary influx of cash for that purpose from the Treasury Board mid-way through last year, and there was no new money announced for the commissioner in last week’s budget.

Changing technology drives need for reviews

The Liberal government promised several reforms to the law and procedures governing access to information requests, through which members of the public can obtain government emails, documents, and data, though they are often withheld or heavily redacted through broad exemptions in the Access to Information Act.

Liberal MPs voted down Conservative MP Pat Kelly’s motion last week that the minister responsible for the Access to Information Act, Scott Brison, appear before the House Ethics Committee to explain the pause on proposed transparency reforms. The Hill Times photograph by Peter Mazereeuw

The Liberals campaigned on promises to undertake a full review of the Act every five years; to make government data available in more user-friendly formats; to waive most user fees associated with requests; to give the federal information commissioner the power to compel documents from government; and to open ministers’ offices, the PMO, and administrative institutions that support Parliament and the courts to access requests.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau (Papineau, Que.) has also ordered that all government information be made “open by default” to the public.

Mr. Brison has already ordered that all fees beyond a $5 initial filing fee for requests be waived, and that data be made available in user-friendly formats. The remainder of the government’s access to information promises have been put on the back-burner.

Mr. Brison’s office had told The Hill Times just last month that changes to open up ministers’ offices and the PMO to access requests would be introduced before the winter’s end—a timeline that technically expired last week at around the same time of Mr. Brison’s office’s statement to the Canadian Press dismissing that target.

Mr. Brison announced last year that the first legislative review of the Access to Information Act would not begin until next year. He told The Hill Times last week that regular reviews would ensure the Access to Information Act would never become out of date, as it is now, saying that was “important given the rapidity of change of digital information and technology.”

Liberals block call to bring Brison before committee

The Liberal majority on the House Access to Information, Privacy, and Ethics Committee voted down a motion last week that would have summoned Mr. Brison to explain his decision to postpone the access to information reforms.

The motion was put forward by Conservative MP Pat Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge, Alta.), and supported by the NDP and Conservative members, not counting the committee chair, Conservative MP Blaine Calkins (Red Deer-Lacombe, Alta.), who did not vote, as per convention. The six Liberals on the committee defeated the motion, 6-3.

Mr. Kelly told the committee that Mr. Brison appeared to be “on his way” to breaking the government’s promises to reform the Access to Information Act, and said he should be called to “explain himself.” Fellow Conservative Matt Jeneroux (Edmonton Riverbend, Alta.) made a similar pitch to the group. None of the Liberals MPs spoke to the motion, nor did NDP MP Karine Trudel (Jonquière, Que.), who was there as a substitute for Daniel Blaikie (Elmwood-Transcona, Man.).

peter@hilltimes.com

@PJMazereeuw

Liberal campaign promises around access to information

Promise Fulfilled?
Make it easier for Canadians to access information by eliminating all fees, except for the initial $5 filing fee. Yes
Government data and information should be open by default, in formats that are modern and easy to use. We will update the Access to Information Act to meet this standard. Partially. Data is more often available in user-friendly formats, but information is often still withheld from media and Parliamentarians, and the Act has not been changed. The minister responsible, however, has issued an interim directive strongly encouraging federal officials to make information open by default.
Expand the role of the information commissioner, giving them the power to issue binding orders for disclosure. Not yet
Ensure that Access to Information applies to the Prime Minister’s and ministers’ offices, as well as administrative institutions that support Parliament and the courts. Not yet
Undertake a full legislative review of the Access to Information Act every five years. Not yet; promised for 2018

More in News

Federal Conservatives say green technology, not taxes key to meeting Paris targets

News|By Beatrice Paez
To encourage more investment in green technology, the plan also pitches a $340-million 'green patent credit' aimed at prodding companies to spend more on research and develop their products for market.

Canada’s Mali extension shortens medevac gap, but questions remain over when replacements will arrive

News|By Neil Moss
The Canadian government's commitment to peacekeeping weakened following the removal of Stéphane Dion as foreign affairs minister, says former adviser Jocelyn Coulon.

Phoenix replacement vendors say they’re ready for the challenge of competing pay systems

News|By Mike Lapointe
‘All we ever wanted out of this was a working pay system, and if it's working pay system(s), we’re OK with that, too,’ says PIPSC president Debi Daviau.

Journalists inherit ‘institutional blindspots’ that cloud coverage of race in politics, says media expert

When confronted with their biases, Prof. Tolley says journalists she interviewed for her research tried to explain away differences in their framing of a candidate’s electability.

‘Embarrassing,’ ‘bullying’ social media posts prompt some Senators to push for policies governing how Senators, staff use the platforms

‘Harassment is harassment and it must be recognized and we must tackle it,’ says Sen. Tony Dean.

Early third-party advertising ‘unintended consequence’ of fixed election dates, says minister

News|By Mike Lapointe
Democratic institutions critic calls period prior to pre-writ ‘open season,’ with both politicians and academics saying they expect more political advertising during sporting events.

Trudeau lays out case for re-election in Trans Mountain speech

The prime minister said construction on the pipeline is scheduled to begin this summer. He was less clear about whether more pipelines will be needed, or how the government will recover the cost of the Trans Mountain.

Liberals getting ‘homework’ done on new NAFTA before passage in U.S. and Mexico, but NDP say bill being rushed

News|By Neil Moss
The House of Commons International Trade Committee will have a pre-study on June 18 to hear from between 12 and 15 witnesses in preparation for the possibility that the committee will review Bill C-100 in the summer.

If he wants to win, Scheer needs to build his own brand, separate from Ford’s and Kenney’s, say political analysts

News|By Abbas Rana
The risk for Andrew Scheer is that the Liberals will try to connect Doug Ford to Andrew Scheer and then try to connect that to hidden agenda, that’s not flattering to Andrew Scheer and the Conservatives,’ says Nik Nanos.
Your group subscription includes premium access to Politics This Morning briefing.