Home Page News Opinion Foreign Policy Politics Policy Legislation Lobbying Hill Life & People Hill Climbers Heard On The Hill Calendar Archives Classifieds
Hill Times Events Inside Ottawa Directory Hill Times Store Hill Times Careers The Wire Report The Lobby Monitor Parliament Now
Subscribe Free Trial Reuse & Permissions Advertising
Log In
Global

City on a hill, tarnished beyond recognition

By Jim Creskey      

Canada’s leaders must know that the resentments that led to the Trump victory are also present here. How we deal with them will be a test for the Trudeau government, a test we can’t afford to fail.

Buttons emblazoned with the Republican Party's iconic elephant symbol at an election night party in Ottawa, hosted by U.S. Ambassador Bruce Heyman. The Hill Times photograph by Jake Wright
Share a story
The story link will be added automatically.

President-elect Donald Trump awaits the traditional high-noon inauguration date on January 20, a divisive master of scapegoating, while a Republican Congress, former fortress of obstruction, is about to lurch into dangerous uncertainty.

The political stress level of Americans, reported to be 52 per cent before the election, now enters the red zone. For that matter, what about the stress of Canadians and citizens of other countries who were convinced that the most powerful nation in history was becoming unhinged? Now we are watching it happen.

As the vote was counted, a collective and premature sigh of relief that followed early polls soon became a dull sense of disbelief. Trump’s statement a day before that, “If I don’t win I will consider it a tremendous waste of time, energy, and money,” had people believing that his bid to become president was a lark, akin to nothing more than another failed casino project.

Now it begins to sink in that a crazed impossibility has come to fruition.

The election campaign that the country and the world was forced to endure was a kind of torture of racism, misogyny, and xenophobia soon to be followed by collective PTSD.

During the campaign, Americans were pandered to, milked as victims, and treated to choking doses of fear and loathing worthy of any second-rate tabloid news site. At the very least they were treated like bilked consumers instead of citizens.

Trump supporters, said to be longing for a return to the social (and possibly religious) fundamentalism of the 1950s, may soon inherit a whirlwind of resentment and something far worse than the 50s and 60s ever saw.

The Eisenhower 50s and the Kennedy 60s were not like this; they were struggling with the spectre of Cold War, imbedded racism, and gender discrimination, but they carried hope.

“Ask not what your country can do for you,” said John F. Kennedy in his inaugural address in 1961, “ask what you can do for your country.”

Kennedy wasn’t doing anything exceptional by asking citizens to make a sacrifice for the common good. Past American presidents, even jurists, had asked the same—many of them taking the lead from Gospel quote: “From everyone who has been given much, much will be demanded…”

Americans and their federal government had in the past expected much of those citizens who were given much.

In the year JFK was elected, the nation was happy to accept a top-bracket income tax rate over 90 per cent which, contrary to today’s popular opinions about taxes, managed to keep the economy, the middle-class, and even the stock market growing and the government out of debt.

But America and the world can’t go back to 1950 and start over again. For African Americans, Islamic peoples, immigrants and refugees, for women and the LGBT community, this is a chilling result.

For America’s neighbours—especially Canada—this is like having a close friend who is a recovering alcoholic fall off the wagon and get into serious trouble as a result.

When the Trump campaign singled out Canada’s healthcare system for derision, it was a reminder that, seen from Canada, Barack Obama’s courageous attempt to take on the powerful insurance and corporate health lobbies amounted to only a tepid (and now we know only temporary) response to a pressing need.

Never claiming their healthcare system to be a model of perfection, Canadians—and for that matter, the rest of the developed world—understand that a 21st century country without universal healthcare is a country rushing to destroy its middle class.  Serious medical procedures become second mortgages, ongoing procedures become home evictions. For the working poor, there is simply a lower life expectancy and infant mortality rate.

Canadians wondered, how could working-class Trump supporters not see this?

At the same time, it does Canada no good being smug about the fallout from this unsavory campaign.

Canada is not Russia or any other country that sees the U.S. as an adversary.

Foreign Policy magazine’s Julia Ioffe wrote that it is a gift to Vladimir Putin to now discover, “a deeply fractured American system, once held up as a shining alternative to Moscow’s style of power, now tarnished beyond recognition.”

I am certain that the last thing Canadians want is a fractured, tarnished America. Canada wants a good neighbour.

But Canada’s leaders must know that the resentments that led to the Trump victory are also present here. How we deal with them will be a test for the Trudeau government, a test we can’t afford to fail.

Politics This Morning

Get the latest news from The Hill Times

Politics This Morning


Your email has been added. An email has been sent to your address, please click the link inside of it to confirm your subscription.
More in News

Liberals on Ethics Committee kibosh motion for hearing with commissioner

News|By Beatrice Paez 4:47 PM ET
Liberal MP Steve MacKinnon, who spoke for all but one Liberal on the committee, says a comprehensive account on the affair is already in the public record, pointing to 13 hours of committee testimony and the commissioner

PSAC head says avoiding Conservative government ‘No. 1’ election issue

News|By Mike Lapointe
A number of unions have registered as third party advertisers in the lead up to the October election, but PSAC, PIPSC and CUPW, all big spenders in 2015, haven't locked down their exact spending goals yet.

Early Manitoba election call bad news for Trudeau Liberals: observers

The Manitoba Progressive Conservatives are projected to win another majority government, which would be a boon to the federal Conservative campaign.

‘Tread on Bill 21 waters very, very lightly’ Green Party warns Quebec candidates

'We have a lot of candidates running in rural ridings, and we know that in certain areas there is big support for Bill 21,' says deputy leader Daniel Green.

OECD praise of ‘model’ skilled labour track system a rejection of anti-immigrant stereotypes, says Kwan

News|By Mike Lapointe
The Conservatives are trying to maintain 'the greatest level of flexibility' they can by avoiding outlining specific immigration targets leading up to the election, says pollster Nik Nanos.

Opposition MPs hopeful Liberal-majority committee will give ethics watchdog green light to testify on SNC-Lavalin affair

News|By Palak Mangat
Opposition MPs are hopeful that Liberals on the House Ethics Committee will agree to have the ethics commissioner testify on his latest report.

Liberal nomination in Pierrefonds-Dollard expected to be multi-ballot, nail-biter contest, say candidates

News|By Abbas Rana
At least seven candidates are seeking the Liberal nomination in the safe Liberal riding of Pierrefonds-Dollard, Que. and have signed up more than 6,000 riding association members.

‘Fundraiser-in-chief’: Trudeau tops list of big-ticket political fundraisers

News
Cabinet ministers with a national profile and influential portfolios are typically in demand, say political observers.

Anti-abortion group RightNow on cross-country tour to recruit volunteers for anti-abortion candidates

RightNow, an anti-abortion group formed in 2016, says it is looking to flip 50 seats to anti-abortion candidates.
Your group subscription includes premium access to Politics This Morning briefing.