Home Page Election 2019 News Opinion Foreign Policy Politics Policy Legislation Lobbying Hill Life & People Hill Climbers Heard On The Hill Calendar Archives Classifieds
Hill Times Events Inside Ottawa Directory Hill Times Store Hill Times Careers The Wire Report The Lobby Monitor Parliament Now
Subscribe Free Trial Reuse & Permissions Advertising
Log In
Opinion

Why I submitted the Green Party resolution to revoke the Jewish National Fund’s charitable status

By Corey Levine      

It is not easy to move forward in the face of such sustained, yet patently false, attacks. I am proud of my Jewish heritage and traditions. My actions do not make me anti-Semitic or anti-Israel. Neither are the Green Party and its leader anti-Semitic or anti-Israel.

The Green Party National Convention began in Ottawa on August 5, 2016. Green Party of Canada Twitter Photo
Share a story
The story link will be added automatically.

Recently, two Holocaust survivors and human rights activists died; both having lived long and fruitful lives. Over the course of his life, the writer Elie Wiesel received many prizes and much praise for his activism, including speaking out for the beleaguered peoples of Bosnia and Rwanda. Hedy Epstein was no less passionate an advocate; at the age of 90, she was arrested for protesting the fatal shooting of unarmed black teenager Michael Brown by police in Ferguson Missouri.

But it was the conflict in the Middle East that flamed Ms. Epstein’s social justice passions the most, using her pulpit as a survivor of the atrocities committed against the Jews in World War II to encourage people to help stop the sufferings of Palestinians caused by Israel’s occupation.

As a Jew committed to tikkun olam, the ideals of social justice that I learned from my parents, I follow the Hedy Epstein school of Holocaust lessons: two wrongs do not make a right.

It is why I decided to submit a resolution to the Green Party to revoke Revenue Canada’s charitable status of the Jewish National Fund of Canada, and why I co-sponsored the resolution calling for the boycott, divestment, and sanctioning of Israel until they end their occupation of Palestine. While both resolutions have been roundly condemned by some as anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli, including the former president of the Green Party, Paul Estrin, in this newspaper, I have chosen to heed the words of Ms. Epstein, “Remember the past, don’t hate, but don’t be a bystander.”

The policies of the JNF are well documented. Both the UN Committee for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the U.S. State Department have called the JNF discriminatory because of its practice of selling or leasing land only to Jews. But even more important, the Attorney General of Israel—in a 2005 ruling against the JNF—stated that their practice of refusing to sell or lease their lands to non-Jewish citizens of Israel amounts to discrimination.

In Canada, the JNF has raised money for its project in Israel, Canada Park. A beautiful 80,000 acre of lush greenery, this oasis of rest and recreation also happens to sit atop the ruins of the Palestinian villages of Deir Ayyub, Imwas, and Yalu. The residents of the latter two villages along with those of neighbouring village, Beit Nuba, were forcibly expelled from their homes and the villages deliberately destroyed during the 1967 war. The villagers played no role in the fighting and held aloft white flags when Israeli soldiers entered their communities.

Under the guise of ‘greening’ the area, the seized land was then given to the JNF which conveniently built Canada Park a few years later. This contravenes Canadian government policy, which does not recognize permanent Israeli control over lands occupied since 1967, as well as international law.

CBC’s Fifth Estate produced a documentary about the forced expulsion, the deliberate destruction of the villages, and the establishment of the park. In the words of former Israeli parliamentarian, Uri Avnery, “By putting that park there and calling it ‘Canada Park’, you give a Canadian cover-up to a war crime.” (CBC TV, “Canada Park: A Park with no Peace,” 1991).

To this day, there has never been any acknowledgement or recognition of the actions by the Israeli government or compensation given to the nearly 10,000 people who were forced out of their homes, and who have not been granted the right to return, as stipulated under international law, while Canada Park physically prevents any return from taking place.  Yet, because of JNF’s charitable status, the park continues to be subsidized by the Canadian taxpayer.

It is not easy to move forward in the face of such sustained, yet patently false, attacks. I am proud of my Jewish heritage and traditions. My actions do not make me anti-Semitic or anti-Israel. Neither are the Green Party and its leader anti-Semitic or anti-Israel. The Green Party and its leader are absolutely not anti-Semitic or anti-Israel. But as a party that emphasizes our commitment to the environment, neither should the party stand idly by while grave human rights abuses are done in the name of environmentalism, particularly when such abuses are subsidized by our taxpayer dollars.

I like to think that Hedy Epstein, whose memoir was titled, “Remembering Is Not Enough,” would have been proud of the action I am taking.

The Hill Times 

Politics This Morning

Get the latest news from The Hill Times

Politics This Morning


Your email has been added. An email has been sent to your address, please click the link inside of it to confirm your subscription.

McKenna wins re-election in Ottawa Centre, trumpets voters’ support for climate fight

News|By Neil Moss
'I’m so relieved,' Catherine McKenna said, about continuing with the Liberal climate change plan.

Election 2019 was a ‘campaign of fear,’ say pollsters

'There may well be a message to this to the main parties, that slagging each other will only take you so far,' says Greg Lyle.

Election 2019 campaign one of the most ‘uninspiring, disheartening, and dirtiest’ in 40 years, says Savoie

News|By Abbas Rana
Green Party Leader Elizabeth May says she has never seen an election where mudslinging overwhelmingly dominated the campaign, leaving little or no time for policy discussion.

Strategic voting to determine if Liberals will form government, say political players

News|By Abbas Rana
As many as nine per cent of progressive voters could vote strategically in this close election potentially affecting the outcome in more than 100 ridings, says Innovative Research president Greg Lyle.

Turkish offensive should pressure feds to act on repatriation of Canadian citizens in Kurdish-controlled ISIS detention camps, says expert

News|By Neil Moss
The issue of repatriation will be less politically fraught after the election, says expert.

Business tops experience among 2019 candidates, one-third have run for office before

Here’s an analysis of the record 1,700-plus candidates running for the six major parties this election.

Pod save us all: the growing role of political podcasts in election 2019

News|By Mike Lapointe
The Hill Times spoke with some podcast hosts taking a deeper dive into the political nitty-gritty, within a medium that only continues to grow in popularity.

No-shows from Conservative candidate could hurt party’s chances in tight Kanata-Carleton race, say politicos

News|By Palak Mangat
The Conservative's candidate, Justin McCaffrey, has skipped two events, including a debate on the environment, intended to feature all candidates.

For whom will the bell toll in Peterborough-Kawartha?

In a riding where voters are deeply engaged in the political process, candidates avoid the low-hanging fruit and stay out of the mud as they grapple with who to send to the House of Commons.
Your group subscription includes premium access to Politics This Morning briefing.