Home Page Election 2019 News Opinion Foreign Policy Politics Policy Legislation Lobbying Hill Life & People Hill Climbers Heard On The Hill Calendar Archives Classifieds
Hill Times Events Inside Ottawa Directory Hill Times Store Hill Times Careers The Wire Report The Lobby Monitor Parliament Now
Subscribe Free Trial Reuse & Permissions Advertising
Log In

Canadians don’t like Donald Trump, at all

By Warren Kinsella      

But don’t think, not for a moment, that we don’t have quite a few Donald Trumps up here, too. We do.  

Share a story
The story link will be added automatically.

TORONTO—Canadians don’t like Donald Trump. From the Prime Minister right on down to your average Canadian citizen, we don’t like the things that the Republican presidential candidate says. At all.

 We don’t like his use of vulgarities to describe women (he calls them “fat pigs,” “dogs,” and “disgusting animals”).  We don’t like what he has said about Mexicans (they’re “killers and rapists”). We don’t like that he promotes lies, like when he said that most whites are killed by blacks—or that Muslims in New Jersey celebrated 9/11 (respectively, “Am I gonna check every statistic?” and “It did happen, I saw it!”). We don’t like the roughing up of a black protester at one of his rallies, and we don’t like his mocking of a disabled New York Times reporter. 

Most notably and most recently, we don’t like his plan to stop all Muslims from entering America.  That now-infamous statement— there should be “a complete shutdown,” of Muslim tourism and immigration in the U.S., quote unquote—probably would have sounded more authentic with an Austro-Bavarian accent, say circa 1930.  But Trump’s words were sufficiently understood to invite condemnation from around the world, and across Canada, too.

 And, guess what? As soon as he made his statement, he went up in several U.S. polls. It made him much, much more popular. In New Hampshire, in fact, it propelled him to a lead that is more than double his nearest opponent for the GOP presidential nomination.

 Now, before you lose your mind, or before you think that most Americans are just as awful as Donald Trump, let me take you back in time. Let me take you back to one evening in March 1989.

 On that night, self-described “moderate fascist” David Irving came a certain town. There he stood, beaming, beneath the glittering chandeliers at the posh old hotel. Management had been asked by several people to deny the British Holocaust denier a room rental, but they adamantly refused.

 So, there Irving was, dressed in a natty suit and protected by about a dozen neo-Nazi skinheads. Then and now the sainted knight of neo-Nazis, white supremacists and Hitler freaks around the globe, Irving stood before his audience and declared himself a “hardcore disbeliever” in the gas chambers used to exterminate Jews at Auschwitz.

 Now, Irving is kind of like Trump. Guys like them—and the organizations they lead—come and go. David Duke, David Irving, Jim Keegstra, and Ernst Zundel: their existence is regrettable, but largely unavoidable, in societies that cherish free speech. That’s the bad news. The good news, however, is that they rarely attract many followers.  Overwhelmingly, folks are decent, and they reject overt racism and anti-Semitism.

 Most of the time, that is. But not always.

On that night in March 1989, I saw more than 300 people walk into that hotel’s ballroom. It was sold out. Dozens were turned away.

 Irving’s audience was mainly comprised of older, white men and women from the surrounding area. They stood and wildly applauded his statement about the gas chambers, and virtually every word he said after that. The neo-Nazi skinheads slouched at the ballroom’s doors and handed out copies of a self-published magazine. It called for “death to race mixers,” contained tributes to Adolf Hitler, and called for “race revolution.”

 It was an astonishing scene, of course. And all of it was taking place below the gilt ceilings of this wonderful, renowned hotel. More than 300 people, paying to listen to a notorious Holocaust denier, knowing in advance that the media would be there to document their presence.  They came anyway. And they weren’t hateful nobodies, either.

 There was a school trustee, a former ranking diplomat, a Department of Justice lawyer, dozens of public servants, plenty of school teachers: all of them there, notwithstanding the risk of media exposure, to hear their St. George, the one whose bestselling books would slay the twin-headed dragon of International Jewry and Communism. As a reporter for the Calgary Herald and the Ottawa Citizen, I had followed North America’s far right movement for quite some time, but I was surprised and disturbed by what I witnessed that night.

 Seven months following that wildly successful visit, David Irving flew to Austria and spoke to banned neo-Nazi groups. In Vienna and Leoben, Irving stated “the gas chambers in Auschwitz never existed.” Later on, when not sharing stages with former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke or one-time American Nazi Party leader William Pierce, Irving would call survivors of the Auschwitz death camp “assholes,” and claim that “more women were killed in the back seat of Edward Kennedy’s car in Chappaquiddick than in the gas chambers at Auschwitz.”

 But before all that, one night in March 1989, David Irving had appeared in a place called Ottawa, Ont., at a hotel called the Chateau Laurier.  At a sold-out event attended by many important people—and some elected people—who gave the notorious Holocaust denier ovation after ovation. At an event the hotel refused to cancel.

 So: condemn Donald Trump, to be sure. Rally against the hatred he preaches. Oppose his loathsome followers.

 But don’t think, not for a moment, that we don’t have quite a few of them up here, too.  

 Because we do.  

Warren Kinsella is a Toronto-based lawyer, author, and commentator. He has been a special assistant to prime minister Jean Chrétien and has also been a ministerial special representative on aboriginal files since 2003. 


The Hill Times

Politics This Morning

Get the latest news from The Hill Times

Politics This Morning

Your email has been added. An email has been sent to your address, please click the link inside of it to confirm your subscription.

McKenna wins re-election in Ottawa Centre, trumpets voters’ support for climate fight

News|By Neil Moss
'I’m so relieved,' Catherine McKenna said, about continuing with the Liberal climate change plan.

Election 2019 was a ‘campaign of fear,’ say pollsters

'There may well be a message to this to the main parties, that slagging each other will only take you so far,' says Greg Lyle.

Election 2019 campaign one of the most ‘uninspiring, disheartening, and dirtiest’ in 40 years, says Savoie

News|By Abbas Rana
Green Party Leader Elizabeth May says she has never seen an election where mudslinging overwhelmingly dominated the campaign, leaving little or no time for policy discussion.

Strategic voting to determine if Liberals will form government, say political players

News|By Abbas Rana
As many as nine per cent of progressive voters could vote strategically in this close election potentially affecting the outcome in more than 100 ridings, says Innovative Research president Greg Lyle.

Turkish offensive should pressure feds to act on repatriation of Canadian citizens in Kurdish-controlled ISIS detention camps, says expert

News|By Neil Moss
The issue of repatriation will be less politically fraught after the election, says expert.

Business tops experience among 2019 candidates, one-third have run for office before

Here’s an analysis of the record 1,700-plus candidates running for the six major parties this election.

Pod save us all: the growing role of political podcasts in election 2019

News|By Mike Lapointe
The Hill Times spoke with some podcast hosts taking a deeper dive into the political nitty-gritty, within a medium that only continues to grow in popularity.

No-shows from Conservative candidate could hurt party’s chances in tight Kanata-Carleton race, say politicos

News|By Palak Mangat
The Conservative's candidate, Justin McCaffrey, has skipped two events, including a debate on the environment, intended to feature all candidates.

For whom will the bell toll in Peterborough-Kawartha?

In a riding where voters are deeply engaged in the political process, candidates avoid the low-hanging fruit and stay out of the mud as they grapple with who to send to the House of Commons.
Your group subscription includes premium access to Politics This Morning briefing.