Home Page Election 2019 News Opinion Foreign Policy Politics Policy Legislation Lobbying Hill Life & People Hill Climbers Heard On The Hill Calendar Archives Classifieds
Hill Times Events Inside Ottawa Directory Hill Times Store Hill Times Careers The Wire Report The Lobby Monitor Parliament Now
Subscribe Free Trial Reuse & Permissions Advertising FAQ
Log In

Stakeholders looking for industry element to feds’ new science and tech strategy

By Denis Calnan      

Stakeholders are wondering if it will make a strong move toward intertwining business and academia or if the final document will just be new language around old policies.

While the government is working on a renewed federal science and technology strategy, stakeholders are wondering if it will make a strong move toward intertwining business and academia or if the final document will just be new language around old policies.
The move is to update the 2007 government strategy, Mobilizing Science and Technology to Canada’s Advantage. The government said on its website that a new strategy is needed because “the global landscape has changed in the past seven years.”
That’s something many people working in the field agree with.
Nobina Robinson, the CEO of Polytechnics Canada, a national alliance of Canada’s leading research-intensive, publicly-funded colleges and institutes of technology, said the strategy can’t come soon enough. Ms. Robinson was a member of the federal Expert Review Panel on Research and Development, known as the Jenkins panel.
“You can innovate on the shop floor, you can innovate in the oil patch, you can innovate in the resource sector,” said Ms. Robinson.
That is a view shared by Scott Smith, the director of intellectual property and innovation policy at the Canadian Chamber of Commerce.
Mr. Smith said there are several reasons the strategy needs to be renewed.
“Canada is actually sliding on the innovation scale when you look internationally. So all of the indexes—competitiveness, innovation—we’re dropping, instead of improving,” said Mr. Smith, citing consecutive World Economic Forum Global Competitiveness reports that have Canada’s ranking slipping.
“I would suspect the government is looking at those numbers and saying, ‘Okay, well we need to re-evaluate,’” said Mr. Smith.
He said it probably does not make sense for government to keep spending money in the same way it was seven years ago, and instead it needs to turn toward businesses.
“Most research and development is done by large companies,” said Mr. Smith.
“They’re not always looking at breakthrough technologies, where post-secondary institutions might be,” he said, pointing out that would be a reason to continue funding the academic part of the equation.
 “But if you want business to participate there needs to be a commercialization aspect to it,” said Mr. Smith, noting that industry is better at bringing academic research to commercial fruition.
He said the government and its agencies are already doing some effective pairing in other areas that could serve as a good “template,” such as the National Research Council’s pairing with industry and Genome Canada’s genomic applications partnership programs, which pairs businesses with academics.
Suzanne Corbeil, the executive director of the U15 group of Canadian research universities, said that this government has pushed heavily on building relationships between government, universities and industry.
“I would not be surprised to see that reinforced and maybe even in a stronger way than it was before,” said Ms. Corbeil.
She wants to make sure any investment in industry does not come at the expense of work being done at the post-secondary level.
“For our side, what’s important is to keep the balance between that approach to research and funding and program development and policies that support the research enterprise in Canada, along with what the basic research requirements are, the fundamental research programs that are at the beginning of the process, as opposed to those that are on the spectrum more aligned to the private sector,” said Ms. Corbeil.
She said it is important that the government makes the strategy public as soon as possible to help people involved with other business intertwined with the strategy do their job.
“[Details of] the Canada First Research Excellence Fund are poised to be announced very soon. And if there is anything in the strategy that would need for us to be aligned with that, that would be critically important,” said Ms. Corbeil.
Mr. Smith said he expects it will come out soon because of the approaching election so the Conservatives can campaign on it.
One interesting point that is raising some concern is the addition of the word ‘innovation’ to the strategy.
“I don’t think there’s anybody who doubts that Canada needs to have a better 21st century logic of how to stimulate both science, technology development and innovation. All three of which are different things,” said Ms. Robinson.
“There was great hope that adding the letter ‘I’ to the ‘S’ and ‘T’ strategy, we were actually going to do such an update. But as soon as you put in the letter ‘I’—innovation—you’re actually talking about something that’s not just curiosity-driven, blue-sky research. It’s actually market oriented,” which will bring a “return on investments or increase profit,” said Ms. Robinson.
She said the strategy must clearly state the different roles of those who play a part in the science and technology area, compared to those working in innovation.
Neither Ms. Robinson nor Ms. Corbeil is expecting sweeping changes in the strategy.
“To expect a whole new strategy for science, technology and innovation is not on my mind. Simply because that’s not the way it’s been described,” said Ms. Corbeil, who said she expects more of a “tweaking.”
Ms. Robinson notes a strategy is not a program that comes with new funding.
She said she expects “a packaging of the existing status quo,” stating that there may be a lack of vision on the part of the federal bureaucracy, rather than the minister.
Minister of State (Science and Technology) Ed Holder (London West, Ont.) was not able to speak about the strategy because it has not been released yet. The release date has not been made public.

Politics This Morning

Get the latest news from The Hill Times

Politics This Morning

Your email has been added. An email has been sent to your address, please click the link inside of it to confirm your subscription.

Liberal MP Lamoureux continues prolific speaking record, raising opposition ire

‘I’m living the dream,’ says Liberal MP Kevin Lamoureux of his regular House of Commons presence. With more than 550 House interventions so far this Parliament, he’s second only to the Speaker.

‘It’s an ongoing battle’: Bob Rae’s push to move the needle on human rights at the UN

News|By Neil Moss
'You don't stop trying to find ways of resolving differences in opinion, but I do think in this day and age you need a whole range of ways of expressing concern and trying to move opinion,' says Bob Rae.

In parliamentary ‘game of chicken,’ NDP side with Liberals to defeat Conservative motion, averting snap election

News|By Beatrice Paez
The nail-biter 146-180 vote came down in large part to the NDP. Its 24 representatives voted alongside the Liberals and the Greens’ three-member caucus in defeating a Conservative motion.

Feds misled House Defence Committee in 2019 on status of peacekeeping pledges

News|By Neil Moss
'It's a bald-faced lie if they actually said they did and didn't,' says Conservative Defence Committee vice-chair James Bezan of the non-registration of the promised 200-member Quick Reaction Force.

Infrastructure bank’s $10-billion growth plan raises hope of green bond push in Canada

Green bonds are fixed-income financial instruments usually used to secure funding for sustainable infrastructure projects.

Violence directed at Indigenous fishers in Nova Scotia leaves ‘black eye’ on Canada, says Mi’kmaq Senator, as he and rookie Mi’kmaq Grit MP urge long-term solution

News|By Palak Mangat
'I think the current route is a dead end, so if they continue to bang their heads against a wall, everyone’s going to get a headache,' says Independent Nova Scotia Senator Dan Christmas.

House vote looms over Conservative motion that could trigger federal election, as Liberals double down

News|By Palak Mangat
Government House Leader Pablo Rodriguez dodged questions if the government was responsible for setting the stage for a stand-off that could trigger an election, saying the question should be asked of the Conservatives.

‘Six systemic crises’ confronting Canada, and politicians, policy-makers, health-care professionals need ‘systems thinking’ to tackle them, says public policy expert

News|By Mike Lapointe
Global Brief magazine editor Irvin Studin says politicians and policy-makers' thinking is 'too small, it’s too linear, it’s too path dependent, and it looks increasingly absurd as these systemic crises.'

Canada needs a new ‘fiscal anchor’ and Freeland needs to share financial plans, says PBO Giroux

Parliamentary Budget Officer Yves Giroux says he's found it 'much more difficult to get information out of the minister’s officer' since Parliament returned with Chrystia Freeland in charge of the nation's finances.
Your group subscription includes premium access to Politics This Morning briefing.