Home Page Election 2019 News Opinion Foreign Policy Politics Policy Legislation Lobbying Hill Life & People Hill Climbers Heard On The Hill Calendar Archives Classifieds
Hill Times Events Inside Ottawa Directory Hill Times Store Hill Times Careers The Wire Report The Lobby Monitor Parliament Now
Subscribe Free Trial Reuse & Permissions Advertising
Log In

Transit advocates hoping urban projects get their due in new federal infrastructure funding

By Alex Vronces      

The federal government first announced its New Building Canada Plan in the 2013 budget, where it promised to dedicate roughly $47-billion in funding for infrastructure projects at the federal, municipal, provincial and territorial levels through various programs.

Share a story
The story link will be added automatically.

Though cities welcome the billions of infrastructure dollars the federal government plans to deliver over the next 10 years through its New Building Canada Plan, uncertainty still surrounds transit maintenance and expansion projects thanks to the lack of enveloped funding for transit-specific projects and the ambiguity in some of the plan’s details, say stakeholders.

“Is it perfect? No, obviously not,” said Michael Roschlau, CEO of the Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA). “But I don’t know of any other country that has as long-term a federal commitment to infrastructure as this…so we’ve certainly come a long way.”

The federal government first announced its New Building Canada Plan in the 2013 budget, where it promised to dedicate roughly $47-billion in funding for infrastructure projects at the federal, municipal, provincial and territorial levels through various programs. Altogether, with the surplus of money that remained from its prior infrastructure fund, the federal government has dedicated about $53-billion for infrastructure projects of local, regional, or national significance over the next 10 years.

Three programs make up the plan for building infrastructure across the country in cooperation with other levels of government: there is the $32-billion Community Improvement Fund, the $14-billion Building Canada Fund, and the $1.25-billion P3 Canada Fund. 

The Community Improvement Fund and Building Canada Fund are the two that will provide municipalities, provinces and territories with the biggest financial boosts to pursue transit development and maintenance. The former fund consists of $21.8-billion in gas tax transfers to provinces and territories and $10.4-billion in GST rebates to municipalities, while the latter consists of two subparts—one for any level of government and some non-state actors valued at $4-billion and the other for provinces and territories valued at $10-billion. 

But many types of projects are eligible for funding, not just those that are transit-related, and the question as to how much funding transit projects alone will enjoy is unanswerable at this point in time. “It is up to each province, territory and municipality to prioritize projects that are important in their regions,” reads an email statement issued to The Hill Times by Infrastructure Canada.

Though the government heeded some of CUTA’s requests throughout the consultation process, said Mr. Roschlau, it failed to deliver the goods in this regard.

“We were looking for sufficient dollars and being able to have a portion of it that would be dedicated to transit,” he said. “As it turns out, the government wasn’t comfortable dedicating any of it to any particular sector.”

Neither the Building Canada Fund nor the gas tax transfers are attached to particular projects. In fact, the eligible funding categories under the gas tax transfer have been expanded and now include, but are not limited to, many of the sorts of projects eligible to receive funding under the Building Canada Fund — broadband and connectivity, public transit, highways, and disaster mitigation, just to name a few.

“It’s always tricky when you have different partners that need to collaborate, when you need the municipalities and the provinces to come together now to determine what the priorities are,” said Mr. Roschlau. “But I’m not too worried because I think that transit projects are still very much in the forefront in terms of their importance, especially in the larger cities across the country.”

According to data compiled by CUTA, the largest chunk of the gas tax transfer has historically been spent on transit-related projects. From 2007 to 2014, 39 per cent of the original gas tax fund was spent on public transit, with roads and bridges being the second-largest expenditure at 28 per cent and drinking water being the third-largest expenditure at 13 per cent. Water waste and solid waste were the fourth- and fifth-largest expenditures at 11 per cent and four per cent, respectively.

According to other data compiled by CUTA, capital investment from all levels of government in transit rose from over $500-million in 2001 to about $4.5-billion in 2012. Though in 2001 municipal governments were the largest source of funding, provincial and federal governments have since taken on larger roles. Since 2005, if not earlier, the federal and provincial governments together have been providing the majority of funding.

Still, Ottawa Mayor Jim Watson said city leaders were disappointed with the dollar amount the federal government plans to deliver through its Building Canada Fund. 

“The challenge we have is that the $14-billion is significantly less than what a lot of municipalities were expecting,” said Mr. Watson. “Given the sheer magnitude of the costs of building these transit systems, there is going to have to be a greater contribution from all levels of government.”

As it happens now, Mr. Watson said all of Ottawa’s “gas tax money is going into the city’s light rail project.” Banking on getting $600-million from the federal government through its Building Canada Fund and $600-million from the provincial government, Ottawa’s light-rail expansion will require $2.1-billion in investment.

The first project to be funded by the Building Canada Fund was a transit project in Edmonton, an emailed statement from Infrastructure Canada said.

“Through the Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Component of the New Building Canada Fund we have set aside up to $150 million for the Valley Line, with up to $250 million already committed from P3 Canada.”

Mr. Roschlau said this is reassuring and that he and everybody at CUTA “are really pleased that first major project to be announced is a transit project.”

Mr. Roschlau said next steps include ensuring that the Building Canada Plan is leveraged in the optimal way. Mayor Watson also said there is still a lot of work to be done with other big city leaders. 

“My hope is that mayors from across the country will work collaboratively to get the message out that we need all hands on deck when it comes to funding these massive transit projects,” he said. “Unlike a lot of European cities, we’re very far behind in terms of the number of people taking transit versus taking their car.”

Big city leaders and other big players in the municipal movement met up this weekend at the Federation of Canadian Municipalities’ 2014 Annual Conference and Trade Show to learn from experts, connect with each other, and influence decisions made on the federal level that affect municipalities. Urban transit was on the agenda. 

The Hill Times

 

Politics This Morning

Get the latest news from The Hill Times

Politics This Morning


Your email has been added. An email has been sent to your address, please click the link inside of it to confirm your subscription.

Election 2019 campaign one of the most ‘uninspiring, disheartening, and dirtiest’ in 40 years, says Savoie

News|By Abbas Rana
Green Party Leader Elizabeth May says she has never seen an election where mudslinging overwhelmingly dominated the campaign, leaving little or no time for policy discussion.

Strategic voting to determine if Liberals will form government, say political players

News|By Abbas Rana
As many as nine per cent of progressive voters could vote strategically in this close election potentially affecting the outcome in more than 100 ridings, says Innovative Research president Greg Lyle.

Turkish offensive should pressure feds to act on repatriation of Canadian citizens in Kurdish-controlled ISIS detention camps, says expert

News|By Neil Moss
The issue of repatriation will be less politically fraught after the election, says expert.

Business tops experience among 2019 candidates, one-third have run for office before

Here’s an analysis of the record 1,700-plus candidates running for the six major parties this election.

Pod save us all: the growing role of political podcasts in election 2019

News|By Mike Lapointe
The Hill Times spoke with some podcast hosts taking a deeper dive into the political nitty-gritty, within a medium that only continues to grow in popularity.

No-shows from Conservative candidate could hurt party’s chances in tight Kanata-Carleton race, say politicos

News|By Palak Mangat
The Conservative's candidate, Justin McCaffrey, has skipped two events, including a debate on the environment, intended to feature all candidates.

For whom will the bell toll in Peterborough-Kawartha?

In a riding where voters are deeply engaged in the political process, candidates avoid the low-hanging fruit and stay out of the mud as they grapple with who to send to the House of Commons.

Singh’s strong campaign an internal win, whatever the outcome, New Democrats say

Jagmeet Singh’s impressive campaign has ‘rescued’ and ‘refocused’ the NDP after the failed 2015 effort, Ed Broadbent says.

The astrophysicist whose polling aggregator is projecting the election

News|By Neil Moss
The mastermind behind 338Canada, poll aggregator Philippe Fournier, is aiming to correctly call 90 per cent of the seats in the Oct. 21 race.
Your group subscription includes premium access to Politics This Morning briefing.