Government’s border security bill draws heavy criticism from civil rights groups

Mark Carney’s Liberal government is ‘showing itself to be the most anti-privacy government in Canada that we’ve seen in decades,’ says UOttawa professor Michael Geist.
Piggybacking changes to privacy laws ‘has nothing to do with affordability,’ say critics of Bill C-4

Just because the prime minister is in a hurry doesn’t excuse rushing controversial Elections Act changes on the back of needed affordability measures, says Green Leader Elizabeth May.
Bill C-4, the Trojan horse threat to every Canadian’s privacy

A section in the proposed legislation says that no provincial or territorial privacy law can ever apply to a federal party. It’s a shocking overreach.
Liberals propose fast-tracking motion for major projects bill

Bill C-5 would come to a final vote on June 20 under the terms of the motion.
Canadians need an urgent privacy reform

This country urgently needs updated privacy laws to protect Canadians and support inclusive and responsible innovation.
The urgent need for stronger cybersecurity

The repercussions of data breaches go beyond compromised personal information, bringing also a broader economic impact.
Prioritizing privacy is good for Canada

We need modernized privacy laws that advance the public interest, and foster a strong Canadian economy.
AI and the innovation-regulation pendulum

Achieving a healthy balance between innovation and regulation is key as Canada continues to pursue more digital transformation initiatives.
The security clearance process: an explainer from ex-CSIS director Ward Elcock

As politicians politick over Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre not having a security clearance, former CSIS director Ward Elcock breaks down the process.
Foreign interference bill could have ‘chilling effect’ on freedom of expression, but also praised for economic security benefits

Bill C-70, the Countering Foreign Interference Act, received royal assent on June 20. But the legislation still contains loopholes that allow for secret, foreign interference in nomination contests, political party leadership contests, and elections and policymaking processes, says Democracy Watch’s Duff Conacher.