Home Page News Opinion Foreign Policy Politics Policy Legislation Lobbying Hill Life & People Hill Climbers Heard On The Hill Calendar Archives Classifieds
Advertising Subscribe Reuse & Permissions
Hill Times Events Hill Times Books Hill Times Careers The Wire Report The Lobby Monitor Parliament Now
Global

Beyond the basics: Taking Canada–China collaboration to the next level

By Paul Davidson      

Compared to countries like the U.S., New Zealand, and the U.K., Canada isn’t as familiar with the diversity of Asian cultures. We don’t have as deep a knowledge of Asia’s economies, societies, and political systems. We don’t have as many students who can speak Asian languages. For Canada to better partner with China, to lay the groundwork for future academic, economic and trade partnerships, we need to close that gap.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau chats with Chinese Premier Li Keqiang during Mr. Keqiang's visit to Ottawa last year. In advance of Mr. Trudeau's second trip as prime minister to China next week, Universities Canada president Paul Davidson says strengthening the Canada-China relationship starts with academia and research.
The Hill Times file photograph

This century, the challenges facing any one nation are more often than not challenges faced by all. Aging populations, climate change, the unknown implications of technological advancements—these are global phenomena that demand, if not a fully collective response, at least a response that takes full advantage of collective knowledge. Put simply, collaboration is critical.

Canada and China are fortunate to have a solid foundation for the kind of meaningful collaboration we need in the years ahead. Our two countries’ constructive relationship spans trade, business and research, going back to the very opening of diplomatic relations in the 1970s. From the start, university linkages have been a strong contributor to forming those ties.

Today we have the opportunity to solve some of the world’s most pressing problems together, and for Canada to seize its global moment as an innovation leader in the process. This opportunity makes our educational connection with China more important than ever.

Canada–China academic and research collaborations are already generating vital knowledge. The Joint Research Centre for Future Energy and Environment, for example—a collaboration between the University of Alberta and Tsinghua University—is developing sustainable, low-carbon energy solutions to address climate change. The University of Ottawa and the Chinese Academy of Sciences Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica have co-founded a state-of-the-art Joint Research Centre on Systems and Personalized Pharmacology. And there are hundreds more examples from institutions large and small across the country.

Economic opportunity is a direct offshoot of academic collaborations like these. And we know that the majority of export growth among Canadian micro-, small- and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) in the years ahead will come from the Asia-Pacific region, China specifically.

Yet to date the flow of postsecondary traffic between Canada and China has been largely one-way. Roughly 34 percent of Canada’s total international student population is Chinese—about 54,000 postsecondary learners—while only some 3,500 Canadians study in China. That’s less than 0.1 percent of our postsecondary student population.

Without question, having high numbers of Chinese and other international students come to Canada is good for our economy. It represents a contribution of more than $11 billion a year—more than softwood lumber, wheat and other major exports. But the low numbers of Canadian learners going abroad has produced a three-part knowledge gap in what the Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada calls “Asia competence.”

Compared to countries like the U.S., New Zealand, and the U.K., Canada isn’t as familiar with the diversity of Asian cultures. We don’t have as deep a knowledge of Asia’s economies, societies, and political systems. We don’t have as many students who can speak Asian languages. For Canada to better partner with China, to lay the groundwork for future academic, economic and trade partnerships, we need to close that gap.

The Chinese students who come to Canada learn not only their subjects of study but also about Canadian culture, business and economics. Many board with Canadian families, becoming members of the communities they study in and contributing to what could be called “kitchen table diplomacy”—the sharing of cultural understanding and forging of bonds.

Canadian students are not gaining the equivalent knowledge, which would better equip us to collaborate and do business with one of the world’s biggest and most powerful economies. By not supporting and encouraging our students to study abroad, we’re depriving them of opportunities for enrichment—and our country of developing a workforce with a globalized perspective.

To build a better, stronger relationship with China, one that starts with academia and research and carries onto trade and business, we need to do more. A recent report released by the Study Group of Global Education recommends dramatically raising the percentage of Canadian postsecondary students studying internationally to 25 per cent. To better encourage students to study abroad (and support them when they do), the federal government needs to increase funding for international research collaboration.

Canadian postsecondary students also need more options when it comes to learning abroad. The choice can’t be between spending a full term or entire academic year in China or otherwise staying home. That’s why Canada’s universities are creating opportunities for shorter, more flexible academic exchanges. And we need to ensure students get full academic credit when learning internationally, so that the time and expense are worth their while.

Of course, it’s not just a matter of increasing funding. The China–Canada relationship is complex and needs to pay close attention to Canadian values as well as interests. Polling indicates Canadians have some concerns when it comes to partnering with China, specifically about human rights, IP protection and trade imbalances. Canadian universities’ deep ties to China, spanning more than 40 years, provide a foundation of experience to build on as Canada considers how best to engage with China. Formal agreements can help address issues. More collaboration on innovation and education will support change as well. If our work with China projects Canadian values while respecting cultural differences, we can find areas to pursue jointly and bring our countries closer.

Canada has a rare moment to take leadership in international research collaboration and establish a two-way flow of students. We’ve built the right relationships. We have the expertise. With collaboration among universities, government, civil society and business, Canada can become a true global player, and a true global partner.

Paul Davidson is president and CEO of Universities Canada.

The Hill Times

More in News

Military activities, veterans’ support, Phoenix fix big-ticket items in $4B new spending ask

News|By Emily Haws
The Department of National Defence and other departments providing services to active and retired members of the Armed Forces are taking up a sizeable chunk of the $4-billion in extra spending the Liberals have put…

Singh will have to showcase ‘political guts,’ clear progressive message to connect with voters

New leader Jagmeet Singh will have to live up to his promise to boldly dig deeper into social democratic values or he'll risk alienating NDP grassroots as the party tries to create distance from the Liberal…

Texting, sit-downs, and lots of waiting in hotel rooms: the ins and outs of NAFTA lobbying

News|By Shruti Shekar
Dozens of industry groups are dispatching executives to every round of the NAFTA renegotiation, and using texts, emails, and phone calls to try to talk to Canada's negotiating leads about what is being discussed with…

Trudeau, Wilson-Raybould justified in speaking out after controversial Stanley verdict, marked a turning point for Canada, say MPs

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould were right to speak out after the verdict in the Gerald Stanley trial, say Liberal and NDP Parliamentarians, who believe the government and Parliament have to…

What happens if an MP’s found guilty of sexual harassment? No one’s saying

News|By Abbas Rana
All the federal political parties say they take sexual harassment “seriously,” but none will say what disciplinary action they would take against an MP found guilty of it. “We take sexual harassment allegations very seriously,…

Feds’ sweeping, new environmental assessment bill keeps power in ministers’ hands, say observers

The government’s new Impact Assessment Act includes hundreds of pages detailing changes to the environmental assessment process in Canada, but keeps ultimate power over approving natural resource projects in the hands of the federal environment…

NDP reviewing past, present harassment processes amid Stoffer, Weir allegations

The NDP isn’t currently investigating the specific harassment allegations against former NDP MP Peter Stoffer, but it says it's looking into how such complaints were, are now and will be handled, something strategist Robin Sears…

Patrick Brown gaining support since re-emerging to challenge sexual harassment allegations, says adviser, though Conservative MPs largely quiet

Patrick Brown, who in a dramatic move re-entered the Ontario leadership late Friday afternoon, is receiving strong support from all corners of the political world since publicly re-emerging to challenge the sexual harassment allegations that…

NDP elects former Hill staffer Vick as new party president

NDP members elected a new party president on the last day of the party’s 2018 policy convention, with former Hill staffer Mathieu Vick being elevated to the role after garnering roughly 83 per cent of…

WANT MORE EXCLUSIVE HILL TIMES CONTENT?

We’re offering 15% off a year-long subscription to the hill times online content.