Wednesday, Oct. 22, 2014
SUBSCRIBE | LOG IN
Sign up for the free daily email


Canadians clearly deserve better from their science advisory apparatus

The muzzling of federal government scientists, death of evidence, and assault on reason that has been played up in the press and elsewhere has glossed over yet another dimension of closed access to citizens; open, well-informed national science policy advice.

 

To View the rest of this article, please choose one of the following

If you are already a subscriber

Subscribe to The Hill Times

Subscribe to the print and electronic editions and get instant access to The Hill Times online.


Quick Purchase

Purchase this weeks' edition of The Hill Times in electronic format (PDF) for $4.00


Sign Up for a free trial

For access to the website.



back to article Canadians clearly deserve better from their science advisory apparatus
Editor’s Note: Comments that appear on the site are not the opinion of The Hill Times. Personal attacks, name-calling, offensive language, and unsubstantiated allegations are not allowed.
For more information on our commenting policies, please see our Community Discussion Rules page. If you see a typo or error in a story, report it to us here news@hilltimes.com.

Canadians clearly deserve better from their science advisory apparatus

The muzzling of federal government scientists, death of evidence, and assault on reason that has been played up in the press and elsewhere has glossed over yet another dimension of closed access to citizens; open, well-informed national science policy advice.

 

  

Parliamentary Calendar
Wednesday, October 22, 2014
HILL LIFE & PEOPLE SLIDESHOWS
The Hill is locked down Oct. 22, 2014

Anne Marie Creskey
Anne Marie Creskey
Anne Marie Creskey
Anne Marie Creskey
Anne Marie Creskey
Anne Marie Creskey
Anne Marie Creskey
Anne Marie Creskey

MICHAEL DE ADDER'S TAKE