Home Page News Opinion Foreign Policy Politics Policy Legislation Lobbying Hill Life & People Hill Climbers Heard On The Hill Calendar Archives Classifieds
Advertising Subscribe Reuse & Permissions
Hill Times Events Hill Times Books Hill Times Careers The Wire Report The Lobby Monitor Parliament Now
Lobbying

We should tax meat and subsidize fruits and vegetables

By Anna Pippus      

It’s in the best interests of society for all of us to consume fewer animal foods and more fruits and vegetables. Taxes on animal foods coupled with progressive subsidies on plant-based foods would help us achieve this.

Lawyer and animal rights advocate Anna Pippus writes that the artificially low price of animal and processed foods and relatively high price of fruits and vegetables disproportionately negatively impacts the poor.
Hill Times file photograph

Nothing elicits grumbles quite like talking about taxes. Governments around the world tax income, carbon, alcohol, tobacco, sugar, houses, inheritances, even saturated fat. And these taxes can be not insignificant; in Canada, for example, 35 per cent of the pump price for gas is tax.

If a group of investors managing trillions of dollars is correct, the newest tax may be on animal foods. The Farm Animal Investment Risk and Return (FAIRR) recently issued a report warning investors to factor the likely inevitability of a meat tax into their long-term investment strategies. Meat taxes are already being considered by governments in Denmark, Sweden and Germany, and are being discussed by policy experts internationally.

Over-consuming animal foods is undeniably harmful. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization says that the animal agriculture sector should be a “major policy focus” in addressing problems of climate change and air pollution, land degradation, water shortage and water pollution, and loss of biodiversity. The Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House) argues that reducing global meat consumption is essential to avoid catastrophic global warming, urging governments to lead in shifting behaviours. Climate change alone is projected to cost Canadians up to $43 billion annually by 2050.

Diets too high in animal foods and too low in plant-based foods are also associated with a host of lifestyle illnesses, including cancers, cardiovascular disease, type-2 diabetes, and obesity. Up to half of all cancers and 80 per cent of heart disease can be prevented through lifestyle changes, especially the adoption of diets that emphasize whole plant foods. Research from Oxford University shows that shifting towards more plant-based diets could reduce global mortality by 6 to 10 per cent. Together, these diseases and mortality cost the Canadian economy tens of billions of dollars each year in health care expenses and lost productivity.

Clearly, diets rich in animal foods are costly for the public. But not only do they not absorb these externalized costs, Canada’s animal foods industries gain financially through government policies and legislation. Billions of dollars are transferred as direct gifts, including through Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada’s Growing Forward funding programs. For example, the federal government is spending $3.8 million to build the Canadian Beef Centre of Excellence in Calgary with a mandate to increase beef production and sales. Farmers also enjoy antiquated tax deductions, which are realized mostly by large corporations rather than small farmers. And supply management, enabled through federal legislation, allows agriculture companies to inflate food prices. Ironically, supply management is arguably itself a form of meat tax, with benefits accruing to the industry rather than the public.

Lawyer and animal rights advocate Anna Pippus writes that it’s in society’s best interest to consume fewer animal foods, and more fruits and vegetables. Photograph courtesy of Anna Pippus.

The playing field needs to be levelled. Governments around the world are now moving to revise eating recommendations to recommend more plant-based diets. In keeping with this trend, Health Canada has issued a draft update to our own food guide, emphasizing plant-based foods for both health and environmental reasons. But as important as national eating guidelines can be in influencing the menus of individuals and institutions, they’re an insufficient policy response to a pressing social, environmental, and economic issue.

That’s why the World Health Organization has proposed that food-related taxes and subsidies be used to improve health outcomes, and the United Nations and Chatham House are urging government to address diet in their climate change policies. Taxes and subsidies are essential not only for raising revenues, but for shaping socially beneficial behaviour. Carbon taxes, for example, aren’t simply about a cash grab, but are a policy response to the existential threat of greenhouse gas emissions.

Food should be affordable. Taxes on food, then, should be offset with corresponding progressive measures that subsidize healthy, affordable food for those who need it most. Food affordability isn’t an argument against a meat tax; on the contrary, the artificially low price of animal and processed foods and relatively high price of fruits and vegetables disproportionately negatively impacts the poor, as do the impacts of climate change. The solution is not to keep meat cheap for everyone but rather to make accessing healthy, sustainable foods the easy and affordable choice, especially for those with low income.

Taxation isn’t a moral statement or a penalty. It’s a policy tool we use to raise revenues—sometimes to pay for expensive industries with externalized costs—and guide socially positive behaviour. It’s in the best interests of society for all of us to consume fewer animal foods and more fruits and vegetables. Taxes on animal foods coupled with progressive subsidies on plant-based foods would help us achieve this.

Anna Pippus is a lawyer and director of farmed animal advocacy for Animal Justice. 

The Hill Times 

More in News

What happens if an MP’s found guilty of sexual harassment? No one’s saying

News|By Abbas Rana
All the federal political parties say they take sexual harassment “seriously,” but none will say what disciplinary action they would take against an MP found guilty of it. “We take sexual harassment allegations very seriously,…

NDP reviewing past, present harassment processes amid Stoffer, Weir allegations

The NDP isn’t currently investigating the specific harassment allegations against former NDP MP Peter Stoffer, but it says it's looking into how such complaints were, are now and will be handled, something strategist Robin Sears…

Feds’ sweeping, new environmental assessment bill keeps power in ministers’ hands, say observers

The government’s new Impact Assessment Act includes hundreds of pages detailing changes to the environmental assessment process in Canada, but keeps ultimate power over approving natural resource projects in the hands of the federal environment…

Patrick Brown gaining support since re-emerging to challenge sexual harassment allegations, says adviser, though Conservative MPs largely quiet

Patrick Brown, who in a dramatic move re-entered the Ontario leadership late Friday afternoon, is receiving strong support from all corners of the political world since publicly re-emerging to challenge the sexual harassment allegations that…

Some Liberal MPs frustrated with leadership for not sharing anti-abortion political strategy on Canada Summer Jobs program

Some Liberal MPs say they're frustrated the party leadership did not share the political strategy with the caucus on why the government was so adamant on keeping the new controversial reproductive rights clause in the…

NDP elects former Hill staffer Vick as new party president

NDP members elected a new party president on the last day of the party’s 2018 policy convention, with former Hill staffer Mathieu Vick being elevated to the role after garnering roughly 83 per cent of…

NDP delegates protest ‘watered down’ Palestine policy

In the waning hours of the NDP policy convention’s second day dozens of delegates stood in silence with hands raised holding posters proclaiming “Free Palestine” as they protested what some called a “watered down” resolution…

Galvanizing members, regaining momentum key for NDP at convention to be in fighting shape for 2019: strategists

With more than 1,800 New Democrats gathered in Ottawa to debate and help shape future party policies, NDP strategist and former national director Karl Bélanger says a top priority this weekend is to “galvanize” members…

NDP ‘shaken’ by harassment allegations, promises to root out problems in own ranks

The NDP's approach to anti-harassment was the first policy to earn mention at its convention in Ottawa on Friday—despite not being slated on the floor—with outgoing president Marit Stiles apologizing to party members who had…

WANT MORE EXCLUSIVE HILL TIMES CONTENT?

We’re offering 15% off a year-long subscription to the hill times online content.