Legislation
Canada’s exclusion of irregular migrants from health care violates international law
By Y.Y. Brandon Chen Nov. 26, 2018
At present, people living in Canada with irregular legal status generally receive no health benefits whatsoever and must pay out of pocket for health needs and emergencies or rely on charitable care. It’s time that changed.
Immigration Minister Ahmed Hussen, pictured with staffers. Should migrants living in Canada without legal authorization be entitled to health care? The answer, according to a decision issued by the United Nations Human Rights Committee in August, was clearly yes, especially if lack of health care threatens migrants’ lives. Sadly, the Government of Canada has yet to respond, writes Y.Y. Brandon Chen. The Hill Times photographs by Andrew Meade
More in News
Two House chambers? Time to consider it, MPs say
With two chambers now built, in West Block and Centre Block, some MPs say it’s time to have two running permanently.Some Independent Senators say ISG rules around political activity go too far
Sen. Stephen Greene is a Conservative member, Sen. Diane Griffin is a member of both the Tories and Greens, while Sen. Marty Klyne disclosed he’s a Liberal donor. Bains says legislative changes needed to update privacy rules
In a Q&A, the innovation minister also says a report on federal digital and data consultations should be released in the 'coming weeks.'Liberals defeat bid to call on Wilson-Raybould to testify, punt discussion to in-camera meeting
Some Liberal MPs characterized opposition MPs’ efforts to push for PMO officials to testify as a 'fishing expedition.' Wilson-Raybould’s resignation a ‘time bomb’ for Grits, says ex-Liberal aide, while Justice Committee chair says he’s open to hearings
'There’s a need to explain to Canadians whether or not a line has been crossed,' says NDP MP Murray Rankin.B.C. privacy czar calls out political parties; federal parties should heed that call too, say researchers
Federal political parties are ‘totally unregulated, and there’s no oversight, and we have no way of looking behind the door,’ says Prof. Teresa Scassa.Controversial $7-billion fund hasn’t sped up budget implementation: PBO
Only 62 per cent of associated spending has been accounted for in the tabled spending estimates this year, compared to 95 per cent rolled out for the 2017 budget.Senate unlikely to vote on sweeping, controversial environmental assessment bill until May or June
The Senate Environment Committee will be grappling with Bill C-69 until at least mid-April and likely later, and Senators hope to tour cities big and small as part of their work.Bombshell PMO interference allegations ‘extremely damaging’ to judicial system; Wilson-Raybould’s inability to refute allegations creates ‘bizarre’ dynamic in cabinet, say pundits
The non-denial by former justice minister Jody Wilson-Raybould is a 'major problem for the government,' says Tim Powers. Trending Stories
