Home Page News Opinion Foreign Policy Politics Policy Legislation Lobbying Hill Life & People Hill Climbers Heard On The Hill Calendar Archives Classifieds
Hill Times Events Inside Ottawa Directory Hill Times Books Hill Times Careers The Wire Report The Lobby Monitor Parliament Now
Subscribe Free Trial Reuse & Permissions Advertising
Log In
Opinion

Khadr deal recognizes Ottawa went too far in war on terror

By Thomas Walkom      

The deal reached between Omar Khadr's lawyers and the federal government, whereby Ottawa will pay the 30-year-old Muslim-Canadian roughly $10-million in compensation, is not the first of its kind. It won't be the last.

Share a story
The story link will be added automatically.

The Omar Khadr settlement is a sign of the times. It marks a belated recognition that Canada went overboard in the war against terror.

The deal reached between Khadr’s lawyers and the federal government, whereby Ottawa will pay the 30-year-old Muslim-Canadian roughly $10-million in compensation, is not the first of its kind. It won’t be the last.

Prodded by the courts, the government is admitting that its preoccupation with national security in the years following 9/11 allowed—and in some cases encouraged—the abuse of Canadian citizens and residents.

Earlier this year, Ottawa quietly settled with three other Muslim-Canadians—Abdullah Almalki, Ahmad El Maati and Muayyed Nureddin—to avoid a court judgment.

That came almost 10 years after an inquiry, headed by former Supreme Court justice Frank Iacobucci, found that the actions of Canadian security officials had contributed to the torture of these three men in Syrian and Egyptian jails.

The trio filed a $100-million lawsuit. It is not publicly known what they settled for.

This spring, Ottawa also settled one of two lawsuits filed by Abousfian Abdelrazik. He’s the Canadian who was stranded in Sudan for six years (sometimes in jail, sometimes not) because successive Liberal and Conservative governments made it impossible for him to come home.
Stephen Harper’s Conservatives finally relented in 2009, but only after a federal court judge forced their hand.

Two years ago, the Conservative government also settled, for an undisclosed amount, a bizarre case involving Algerian refugee claimant Benamar Benatta.

In 2001, Canadian officials had illegally transported Benatta across the border to the U.S. where they handed him over to the FBI as a terror suspect.

The Americans quickly determined he wasn’t a terrorist, but kept him in jail anyway for five years. He eventually made it back into Canada and is now a Canadian citizen.

The big one though is the settlement reached with Canadian citizen Maher Arar. In 2007, he received $10.5 million—plus $1-million more to cover his legal costs—in compensation for Ottawa’s role in his rendition by the U.S. to Syria, where he was jailed and tortured.

That settlement too came only after a judicial inquiry, which effectively cleared Arar of any role in terrorism, forced the government’s hand.

At one level, Khadr’s case differs from the others. He has always admitted he was fighting on the side of the Taliban in 2002, when he was wounded and captured by U.S. forces invading Afghanistan.

Theoretically, Ottawa could have charged him with treason. But since he was a child of 15 at the time, I suspect the government would have had a hard time making that charge stick.

Or, given that he was a Canadian citizen and child soldier, Ottawa could have pressed the Americans to release him into Canadian custody. But to its shame, the Liberal government of the day didn’t do that either.

Instead, it collaborated with the Americans to confine Khadr, without the protection of the Geneva Conventions, in the U.S. prison camp at Cuba’s Guantanamo Bay—where, to put it mildly, he was interrogated harshly.

He spent 10 years there and eventually took the only exit available—which was to plead guilty, in a military court of dubious legitimacy, to what the U.S. claimed were war crimes.

These “war crimes” included killing an enemy soldier during battle.

In 2010, the Supreme Court ruled that Canada’s participation in the illegal and coercive interrogations at Guantanamo Bay had violated Khadr’s Charter rights.

With that ruling, it was just a matter of time until he received some kind of compensation from the Canadian government.

Now that time has come.

Conservatives such as party leader Andrew Scheer say Khadr does not deserve any money.

They miss the point.

The point is not to enrich Khadr. In fact, I’d bet he would gladly give up the $10-million if he could be miraculously transported to an alternate reality where none of the events leading to this settlement had ever happened.

Rather, the point is to drive home to government, in language it can understand, that the struggle against terrorism does not give the state carte blanche, that even those whose actions make them unpopular must be treated fairly.

Thomas Walkom is a national affairs columnist for The Toronto Star. This column was released on July 7. 

The Hill Times

More in News

‘Underdog’ NDP in Outremont faces ‘hard battle’ to keep ex-leader’s seat: NDP analysts

NDP candidate Julia Sánchez says she has a good campaign team in Montreal, and isn’t losing out on party resources focused on leader Jagmeet Singh's byelection race in B.C.

Federal Court of Appeal sides with BOIE against NDP in satellite-office battle

NDP MPs had been ordered to repay roughly $4-million by the Board of Internal Economy, which they've already started repaying though they've been fighting it in court for five years.

Butts’ exit could help government wield more effective defence strategy in SNC-Lavalin affair, politicos say

News|By Beatrice Paez
Gerald Butts has removed himself from the daily political grind of strategizing how to keep the Liberals in power. But observers say it's unlikely he will be consigned to watch the campaign unfold from the sidelines.

Hill reporters push back against lack of access to MPs in West Block

‘For a reporter, this is terrible,' says CBC's Julie Van Dusen. Two suggestions for new scrum spots were rejected, but talks to find a solution continue.

Perception a problem with retired Supreme Court justices involved in the ‘highly partisan’ SNC-Lavalin affair, say some court watchers

Jody Wilson-Raybould’s hiring of Thomas Cromwell as counsel is ‘good for the client, good for the PMO, good for Canada,’ says a Supreme Court specialist.

Nearly two-thirds of public servants have unresolved pay issues three years after Phoenix launched, survey shows

Results from the 2018 Public Service Employee Survey also indicate harassment stats in the public service are relatively flat despite a PCO push for change.

Criminal charges raises spectre of SNC-Lavalin takeover, but feds’ $180-billion infrastructure plan can find other builders, experts say

News|By Jolson Lim
SNC-Lavalin risks a takeover if it's convicted. But aside from likely outrage in Quebec, Ottawa can find other builders for its infrastructure plans if the company is banned from bidding on federal contracts, experts say

SNC-Lavalin lobbied Liberal-tied ambassador on corruption case, sought help from ex-aides to Chrétien, Mulroney

The Quebec company had extensive access to government ministers and top staffers, and was the only organization registered to lobby for allowing deferred prosecution agreements for white collar crimes.

‘They have to pick a lane, it’s really quite strange’: Trudeau needs a consistent communication strategy on SNC-Lavalin, Wilson-Raybould resignation controversy

News|By Abbas Rana
The SNC-Lavalin affair is yet another example of self-inflicted wounds for the Justin Trudeau Liberals, says pollster Nik Nanos of Nanos Research
Your group subscription includes premium access to Politics This Morning briefing.