TORONTO—A recent large-scale study has found that a great deal of science admissible in Canadian and U.S. courts is unreliable. Brian Nosek of the University of Virginia and his colleagues recently attempted the herculean task of determining if modern psychological science is reliable. To do so, they tried to replicate the results of 100 psychology studies that were already published in prestigious peer-reviewed journals. The collaboration’s findings, published in the journal Science and now widespread in the media,
Unauthorized distribution, transmission, reuse or republication of any and all content is strictly prohibited. To discuss re-use of this material, please contact:
Ryan O'Neill, Director of Reader Sales and Services
613-688-8822 | roneill@hilltimes.com