Subscribe Home Page News Opinion Foreign Policy Politics Policy Legislation Lobbying Hill Life & People Hill Climbers Heard On The Hill Calendar Election 2021 Archives Classifieds
Hill Times Events Inside Ottawa Directory Hill Times Store Hill Times Careers The Wire Report The Lobby Monitor Parliament Now
Reuse & Permissions Advertising FAQ
Contact UsLog In

Shining light on Justin Trudeau’s stand on transparency

By Ken Rubin      

Unfortunately, Justin Trudeau’s private member’s bill would do little to ensure that Parliamentarians and the public would be entitled to know such things as the estimated Canadian Iraq war costs.

It’s been more than 30 years since Pierre Trudeau’s government passed weak access to information legislation. Today, his son Liberal Party Leader Justin Trudeau has put forward as a pre-2015 election gamut, a private member’s bill, “A Transparency Act” (Bill C-613). First reading debate occurred in late November.
Bill C-613 offers up a few amendments to access legislation. But, as described below, those proposals hardly are sufficient game changers to drastically increase opening up government records and meetings.
One proposed change, via an amendment to the Parliament Act of Canada, aims to divide the House of Commons’ secretive Board of Internal Economy meetings into mandatory open and closed sessions. Closed BOIE sessions would continue for security, employment, staff relations and tenders discussions and such secret meetings could be open if all parties, at only their discretion, unanimously agree.
It’s unclear how this consent to open secret BOIE sessions would work in practice. Would it mean, for instance, that the media would be informed in time to be present? And would the Commons Board of Internal Economy’s public sessions be recorded verbatim and broadcast?
It’s not a step forward to keep all BOIE contract matters behind closed BOIE doors, including the payment of lawyers to defend MPs. And why should the BOIE’s discussions or exchanges with the Speaker’s Office, on such staff related matters as setting up procedures for handling cases of sexual assault, remain potentially off-limits to public access and reporting?
Trudeau’s proposed bill does not include covering Parliament under access legislation. Such extended coverage could, for instance, grant public access to the House Speaker’s records and to a parliamentary steering committee’s in-camera deliberations. No mention is made either of the touchy subject of some openness around party caucus meetings, which is allowed in other countries’ access legislation. As a start, last year, Trudeau did order his MPs to make their expenses public.
This bill states that government information should be “made openly” available and that exemptions to public access should be “rare” in addition to being limited and specific, and if there is “uncertainty,” the emphasis should be on releasing records.
In practice, the act’s many exemptions are widespread and these proposed wording changes, while well intentioned, are hardly sufficient to move the yardstick towards greater record releases. What’s required is: the elimination of many of the Access to Information Act’s exemptions and ending the exclusion of Cabinet, ministers’ office, and PMO records, broader coverage, wider open meeting, pro-active disclosure requirements, and stronger whistle blowing protection.
One useful amendment proposed would make machine-readable records that require data retrieval work accessible. Right now, there is official resistance and Federal Court decisions that weigh against such record creation. Trudeau rather awkwardly calls this greater record access coverage an opening “by default.”
The bill does not assign the information commissioner explicit duties to monitor or enforce the production of such machine-readable records. Nor did the bill assign explicit duties to the commissioner to ensure, such as in NDP Pat Martin’s defeated private member’s bill (Bill C-567), that significant government deliberations be done in writing and that there be a “duty to document.”
The Trudeau bill does offer one solution to delays by tying the payment of the $5 application fee to only those with replies sent within 30 days. However, refunding this fee may be cumbersome and not enough of a deterrent to prevent delays in government response times. It would be better to have no application fees and more effective to penalize those agencies responding late and to greatly restrict the length of the time extension officials can claim.
Central to his bill is a proposal to giving the Canada’s access to information commissioner binding orders on matters like fees, delays, and denials. But the bill’s wording only states that the commissioner “may” issue orders.
Again, possibly because of bad drafting, the sole discretion is placed in the commissioner’s hands to determine time lines for the government to carry out such orders while rightly providing the means via the courts to have such commissioner orders enforced. Currently, from personal experience, it can take the commissioner over five years to issue non-binding findings.
Bill C-613’s final amendment clause calls for a mandated immediate Parliamentary review of access legislation and thereafter at least every five years. This suggestion has been made before and may not drive drastic transparency changes. Statutory periodic reviews, while productive, do not guarantee improvements and can give conservative legislation drafters, officials, and special interest groups a regular platform to propose more secrecy provisions.
The Conservative Party response to Bill C-613 delivered in Parliament by Treasury Board parliamentary secretary and Conservative MP Dan Albas was negative. Albas indicated his party would oppose the bill and this means the bill stands little or no chance of getting beyond the first reading debate stage.
Albas stated in the November debate that the Trudeau bill his party opposes would result in more administrative costs and greater delays, including in its provision requiring “detailed explanations” every time an exemption is applied. Forgetting his own leader’s 2006 election pledge, Albas dismissed giving the information commissioner binding order powers.
No party leader is promising in this election year relief from our deadbeat access to information system and well-known secrecy antics.
Unfortunately, Trudeau’s bill would do little if anything to ensure that Parliamentarians and the public would get as a right data now being denied on such matters as the estimated Canadian Iraq war costs and the economic costs of tax evasion.
A party leader like Justin Trudeau must do more than move the secrecy yard line slightly. That’s especially the case if he aspires to be the next PM and wants to be and be seen as a champion advocate for transparency.
Ken Rubin can be reached at kenrubin.ca
news@hilltimes.com
The Hill Times

To keep reading, subscribe and become a political insider.

Only $7.67 / week for one year.

Enjoy unlimited website access and the digital newspaper.

Cancel anytime.

Already a Subscriber?

Liberals and Conservatives can’t even agree on their divisions over release of Winnipeg lab documents

Government House Leader Mark Holland says releasing any sensitive Winnipeg lab documents could compromise ongoing investigations, and could potentially could endanger the lives of Canadian security intelligence officers.

O’Toole attack on Guilbeault an appeal to blue collar class, says strategists

News|By Alice Chen
The tone and style of the Jan. 11 video is an example of Erin O’Toole’s Conservatives 'ramping up,' and 'doubling down' on their rhetoric, says NDP strategist Cameron Holmstrom.

Canada boosts Ukrainian military training mission, but yet to match Kyiv’s ask for lethal weapons, sanctions

News|By Neil Moss
Canada's commitment to its Ukrainian training mission will increase by 60 soldiers to 260 'within days,' and it could increase over time to 400.

In a NAFTA renegotiation team reunion, Freeland’s Finance Department adds Steve Verheul

News|By Neil Moss
Widely praised across the partisan spectrum, Steve Verheul has been called an 'architect' of Canada's trade policy.

‘Cacophony of views’ in national media landscape may not serve viewers, says former CBC bureau chief

News|By Ian Campbell
On a recent episode of the Herle Burly podcast, veteran former journalist and political strategist Elly Alboim weighed in on the state of the national media.

Back in business: House Committees primed to play catch up with busy agendas

‘We’re definitely trying to catch up in an ever-changing period of time for everyone,’ says NDP Whip Rachel Blaney of upcoming House committee work.

Ukraine envoy ‘confident’ talks will lead to Canada meeting requests as Russian threat looms

News|By Neil Moss
As the Canadian government is believed to be preparing a decision on Ukraine's three requests for assistance, Kyiv's top diplomat in Ottawa says 'intensive communication' has taken place at the highest levels.

Reconciliation ‘has no end date,’ says GG Simon who hopes for a future of healing in Canada

Feature|By Christopher Guly
Mary Simon wants to make a significant impact on reconciliation, wants Arctic communities to be healthy and vibrant, and wants to do her part to help fight climate change. It's ambitious stuff.

RCMP union tours Alberta as province explores new police force, contract policing increasingly under microscope

News|By Mike Lapointe
Contract policing arrangements between the Mounties and a number of provinces and municipalities have come increasingly under review by policymakers in recent years.
Your group subscription includes premium access to Politics This Morning briefing.