Thursday, May 23, 2013
START A FREE TRIAL | SUBSCRIBE | LOG IN
Sign up for the free daily email


A week after AG says MPs should better scrutinize government spending, feds and opposition parties rubber-stamp $250.8-billion

The government and the opposition parties are facing criticism for a snap unanimous motion they passed on June 3 that means $250.8-billion in government spending estimates for the next year will not be scrutinized as Parliamentary rules normally require by the 24 House committees.

The Hill Times photograph by Jake Wright
Government spending: Defence Minister Peter MacKay, pictured in this file photo, testified at Tuesday's Government Operations Committee about DND's estimated $21.3-billion in annual spending.

PARLIAMENT HILL—The government and the opposition parties are facing criticism for a snap unanimous motion they passed on June 3 that means $250.8-billion in government spending estimates for the next year will not be scrutinized as Parliamentary rules normally require by the 24 House committees.

To View the rest of this article, please choose one of the following

If you are already a subscriber

Subscribe to The Hill Times

Subscribe to the print and electronic editions and get instant access to The Hill Times online.


Sign Up for a free trial

For access to the website.



back to article A week after AG says MPs should better scrutinize government spending, feds and opposition parties rubber-stamp $250.8-billion
Editor’s Note: Comments that appear on the site are not the opinion of The Hill Times. Personal attacks, name-calling, offensive language, and unsubstantiated allegations are not allowed.
For more information on our commenting policies, please see our Community Discussion Rules page. If you see a typo or error in a story, report it to us here news@hilltimes.com.

A week after AG says MPs should better scrutinize government spending, feds and opposition parties rubber-stamp $250.8-billion

The government and the opposition parties are facing criticism for a snap unanimous motion they passed on June 3 that means $250.8-billion in government spending estimates for the next year will not be scrutinized as Parliamentary rules normally require by the 24 House committees.

The Hill Times photograph by Jake Wright
Government spending: Defence Minister Peter MacKay, pictured in this file photo, testified at Tuesday's Government Operations Committee about DND's estimated $21.3-billion in annual spending.

PARLIAMENT HILL—The government and the opposition parties are facing criticism for a snap unanimous motion they passed on June 3 that means $250.8-billion in government spending estimates for the next year will not be scrutinized as Parliamentary rules normally require by the 24 House committees.

  

HILL LIFE & PEOPLE SLIDESHOWS
Party Central: Raising money, saying thanks to the troops with Party Under the Stars May 21, 2013

The Hill Times photo by Jessica Bruno.
Hill Staffer Cheri Elliott founded her charity, To the Stan and Back, to raise money for soldiers returning from Afghanistan.
The Hill Times photograph by Jake Wright.
Conservative MP and veteran fighter pilot Laurie Hawn and then-chief of defence staff General Walt Natynczyk at the 2011 party.
The Hill Times photograph by Jake Wright.
Tory MPs Chris Alexander, Candice Bergen and Bob Dechert.
The Hill Times photograph by Jake Wright.
Kenzie Potter, chief of staff to House Speaker Andrew Scheer.
The Hill Times photograph by Jake Wright.
Defence Minister Peter MacKay pictured at the 2011 party.

MICHAEL DE ADDER'S TAKE