Email
PrintByers' formula fails in his own province
Michael Byers recently urged the Liberals and NDP to strike a one-time deal where each party would stand down from running candidates in ridings in which the other party placed higher. But his vote switching theory doesn't fly.
OTTAWA—University of British Columbia professor Michael Byers has studied climate change, the war in Afghanistan, and Canada's North. But after a provocative op-ed in last Monday's Toronto Star, I think he should go back and study the actual numbers—at least the fields of voter behaviour and vote switching.
To View the rest of this article, please choose one of the following
If you are already a subscriber
Subscribe to The Hill Times
Subscribe to the print and electronic editions and get instant access to The Hill Times online.
Quick Purchase
Purchase this weeks' edition of The Hill Times in electronic format (PDF) for $4.00
Sign Up for a free trial
For instant access to the website.
Byers' formula fails in his own province
Michael Byers recently urged the Liberals and NDP to strike a one-time deal where each party would stand down from running candidates in ridings in which the other party placed higher. But his vote switching theory doesn't fly.
OTTAWA—University of British Columbia professor Michael Byers has studied climate change, the war in Afghanistan, and Canada's North. But after a provocative op-ed in last Monday's Toronto Star, I think he should go back and study the actual numbers—at least the fields of voter behaviour and vote switching.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
