Home Page News Opinion Foreign Policy Politics Policy Legislation Lobbying Hill Life & People Hill Climbers Heard On The Hill Calendar Archives Classifieds
Advertising Subscribe Reuse & Permissions
Hill Times Events Hill Times Books Hill Times Careers The Wire Report The Lobby Monitor Parliament Now

Brazeau challenges Trudeau to ‘live up to his narrative about reconciliation’ by eliminating sex-based inequities in Indian Act

By Senator Patrick Brazeau      

In the wake of the prime minister's controversial comments about him to Rolling Stone magazine, Independent Senator Patrick Brazeau is urging Justin Trudeau to support legislation eliminating differences in Indigenous registration based on sex, regardless of birth year.

Independent Senator Patrick Brazeau, pictured in this file photo on the Hill, is challenging Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to move past his controversial Rolling Stone comments about him and support an effort by the Senate to eliminate sex-based discrepancies under the Indian Act for all Indigenous peoples. The Hill Times photograph by Jake Wright

You may have heard about some controversial remarks made by the prime minister about me in Rolling Stone magazine. In the article he referred to me as “Indigenous” which is true, and “scrappy,” which, if ever true, is becoming less so with advancing years. The most important outcome of our boxing match is that, together, we raised a lot of money for cancer research.

So, I hold no ill will towards the prime minister about those Rolling Stone comments and I would challenge him to live up to his narrative about reconciliation.

Sometimes you hear people saying that the relationship between First Nations and mainstream Canadians will take “generations” to fix. You often hear that there are no easy solutions. That is false and leads to paralysis and stonewalling.

Take a look at Bill S-3—An Act to amend the Indian Act. This bill aims to remove the sex-based inequalities from the Indian Act. The bill would give children born to women the same rights to their heritage as children with Indigenous fathers from 1951 onward.

An important amendment has been proposed that would eliminate the sex-based inequities in registration in their entirety, not limiting the equality only to the children born to women since 1951.

The prime minister likes to talk about principles and equality. That is part of his narrative. It is his “right story to tell.” But is this all talk and no action?

The refusal to remove all the sexism as requested in the amendment affects two of my children directly. I have been told that, due to the delay in the passage of the bill, my son cannot expect to be granted his status for one to two years. My youngest daughter would never receive her status. My family’s story is only one of the many who are directly and deeply affected by the prime minister’s action—or inaction —on this file.

For First Nations people, our status is primary. Just as a mainstream Canadians cherish their passport or citizenship papers, we cherish our status. It is a part of who we are. Our status connects us to our communities. And as the demographics of Canada change over the years, our status is something that keeps us strongly connected to who we are.

I challenge to prime minister to move on from his Rolling Stone comments and to turn his attention back to S-3, back to his stated beliefs in fairness and justice. I ask him to be a champion for equality rather than just talking about being one.


The Hill Times

More in News

Poor issues management plaguing Trudeau’s team, say strategists

The public relations problems that plagued Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s recent India trip are part of a pattern of poor issues management that politicos say will dog this government if it doesn’t change course quickly.…

Feds move to do full PS staff survey yearly, not every three years

A comprehensive examination of how public servants feel about their workplaces will now be done yearly, instead of every three years, a move welcomed by union representatives, who say there needs to be meaningful action…

Condemning China’s cheap steel Canada’s best defence against U.S. tariffs, say steel caucus MPs

The Liberals will have to address American fears that Canada is being used as an entry point for cheap Chinese steel flooding the United States market if the government wants the threat of tariffs gone…

Delayed Amazon-like federal procurement system projected to go live in 2019

An online platform intended to speed up and simplify federal procurement is almost two years behind schedule, but now has a planned launch in 2019 following $197-million promised in the latest budget. The funding identified…

Liberals under pressure from all sides to give Davie shipyard work, keep Quebec City seats in 2019

News|By Emily Haws
Quebec Parliamentarians of all stripes are pressuring the Liberal government to stem job losses by giving more work to the Davie shipyard near Quebec City, a potential battleground in the 2019 election. Opposition MPs say…

Unions cautiously optimistic about Treasury Board leading post-Phoenix fix, but worry about more delays

News|By Emily Haws
The two largest public service unions are applauding the decision in the 2018 federal budget to have the Treasury Board lead the search for a Phoenix pay system alternative, but caution the government can’t cut…

Upcoming gun bill ‘scaring the hell out of the Liberal caucus,’ and Trudeau’s response to Harvey’s concerns puts a chill on backbenchers, say Liberals

News|By Abbas Rana
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s angry response to a rural MP's concerns raised at a recent national caucus meeting on the Hill over the government's upcoming gun legislation did not go over well with some Liberal…

CPTPP is in the bag, but Liberals failing to execute on trade with Asia, say top Senator, trade analyst

The federal Liberal government hasn’t done enough to expand trade ties in Asia, say a top Trudeau-appointed Senator and a prominent Ottawa trade analyst, despite signing the CPTPP, an 11-country trade agreement for the Asia-Pacific…

Senators took a pass on votes nearly 200 times since election—a sign of ‘unconvincing’ speakers, says Sen. Cools

Yea, nay, or I won’t say: when it comes to voting in the Upper Chamber, Senators have collectively chosen to abstain from votes 190 times since the last election, about two-and-a-half times per vote. The…


We’re offering 15% off a year-long subscription to the hill times online content.