Home Page News Opinion Foreign Policy Politics Policy Legislation Lobbying Hill Life & People Hill Climbers Heard On The Hill Calendar Archives Classifieds
Advertising Subscribe Reuse & Permissions
Hill Times Events Hill Times Books Hill Times Careers The Wire Report The Lobby Monitor Parliament Now

Lake Huron still preferred nuclear waste site for OPG

By Thomas Walkom      

Catherine McKenna can keep asking but all she will get are the same non-answers. It is a classic standoff between a first-term minister and a canny bureaucracy. We shall see who blinks first.

In early 2016, Catherine McKenna, the new Liberal environment minister, announced that she wasn't entirely satisfied with the Lake Huron choice. OPG was ordered to investigate other potential locations. The Hill Times photograph by Sam Garcia

TORONTO—Credit Ontario Power Generation for this: when it comes to choosing a place to store nuclear waste, the Crown corporation is consistent.

It wants to bury the stuff beside Lake Huron. Period.

And no matter how many times federal regulators ask it to seriously examine other locations, OPG respectfully rags the puck.

It makes a cursory examination and then stubbornly comes back with the same answer: Lake Huron.

It did it again this week.

The Lake Huron saga has been going on since 2005. Ontario’s nuclear generating plants produce radioactive waste that is now stored above ground. OPG was charged with finding a place to bury some of it.

The utility started small, searching for a spot to bury the most innocuous low and intermediate-level radioactive waste—such as contaminated rubber gloves.

In a rather clever move, OPG ultimately settled on Kincardine, a municipality on the Lake Huron shoreline that already hosts Bruce Power’s nuclear plant.

Many parts of the province might resist a nuclear waste dump. But to a fair number of people in the Kincardine area, nuclear means jobs.

That’s why OPG was able to win the most elusive requirement for its proposed dump—the approval of local municipal politicians.

The utility was also able to argue convincingly that, barring an earthquake or some other unanticipated event, the geology of the region is ideal for containing radioactive waste.

Sure, the proposed 680-metre deep crypt would only be 1.2 kilometres from Lake Huron—a fact which has alarmed communities on the American side as well as many Ontarians who depend on the Great Lakes for drinking water. But OPG was adamant that the waste wouldn’t leak.

Somewhere along the line, the utility announced that it wanted to double the size of the dump. It also said it planned to store dismantled reactor parts there, some of which would remain radioactive for more than 100,000 years.

None of the highly radioactive fuel rods from Ontario’s nuclear generating plants would be stored in this particular crypt. A separate federal agency is looking for somewhere to bury these items.

In May 2015, after two years of hearings and deliberations, a federal environmental assessment panel conditionally approved the OPG project. But with an election in the offing, Canada’s then Conservative government put off any final decision.

With opposition to the dump raging up and down the Lake Huron shoreline, the proposal was just too controversial.

In early 2016, Catherine McKenna, the new Liberal environment minister, announced that she wasn’t entirely satisfied with the Lake Huron choice. OPG was ordered to investigate other potential locations.

The utility took almost a year to come up with a strikingly inadequate report that made no effort to identify specific alternative sites.

It said while the waste could, in theory, be buried somewhere else in the province, Lake Huron’s shoreline was still the best choice.

Since no other specific sites were investigated, it is hard to see how the utility came to that conclusion. But it did.

It is, however, easy to understand OPG’s frustration. The utility has been at this game for years. It even found a willing municipal host—no easy task.

Still, McKenna’s environmental assessment agency was unimpressed. It told OPG its report was far too vague and ordered it to provide more information.

Which it did this week.

The latest report still doesn’t identify specific alternate sites. But as an OPG spokesperson told my colleague Jennifer Wells last year, it wasn’t asked to look at “sites,” only at “locations.”

In OPG lingo, “locations” are different from “sites.” Specifically, a “site” is a location with a willing municipal host. And right now, the only Ontario municipal politicians willing to bury nuclear waste are those in the Kincardine area.

This week’s report says all that is needed to seal the deal is the support of local First Nations.

In short, we have gone around the circle again. OPG is unwilling to look at alternate radioactive dump sites because it has already found one.

McKenna can keep asking but all she will get are the same non-answers.
It is a classic standoff between a first-term minister and a canny bureaucracy. We shall see who blinks first.
Thomas Walkom is a national affairs columnist for The Toronto Star. This column was released on June 2.

The Hill Times

More in News

Poor issues management plaguing Trudeau’s team, say strategists

The public relations problems that plagued Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s recent India trip are part of a pattern of poor issues management that politicos say will dog this government if it doesn’t change course quickly.…

Feds move to do full PS staff survey yearly, not every three years

A comprehensive examination of how public servants feel about their workplaces will now be done yearly, instead of every three years, a move welcomed by union representatives, who say there needs to be meaningful action…

Condemning China’s cheap steel Canada’s best defence against U.S. tariffs, say steel caucus MPs

The Liberals will have to address American fears that Canada is being used as an entry point for cheap Chinese steel flooding the United States market if the government wants the threat of tariffs gone…

Delayed Amazon-like federal procurement system projected to go live in 2019

An online platform intended to speed up and simplify federal procurement is almost two years behind schedule, but now has a planned launch in 2019 following $197-million promised in the latest budget. The funding identified…

Liberals under pressure from all sides to give Davie shipyard work, keep Quebec City seats in 2019

News|By Emily Haws
Quebec Parliamentarians of all stripes are pressuring the Liberal government to stem job losses by giving more work to the Davie shipyard near Quebec City, a potential battleground in the 2019 election. Opposition MPs say…

Unions cautiously optimistic about Treasury Board leading post-Phoenix fix, but worry about more delays

News|By Emily Haws
The two largest public service unions are applauding the decision in the 2018 federal budget to have the Treasury Board lead the search for a Phoenix pay system alternative, but caution the government can’t cut…

Upcoming gun bill ‘scaring the hell out of the Liberal caucus,’ and Trudeau’s response to Harvey’s concerns puts a chill on backbenchers, say Liberals

News|By Abbas Rana
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s angry response to a rural MP's concerns raised at a recent national caucus meeting on the Hill over the government's upcoming gun legislation did not go over well with some Liberal…

CPTPP is in the bag, but Liberals failing to execute on trade with Asia, say top Senator, trade analyst

The federal Liberal government hasn’t done enough to expand trade ties in Asia, say a top Trudeau-appointed Senator and a prominent Ottawa trade analyst, despite signing the CPTPP, an 11-country trade agreement for the Asia-Pacific…

Senators took a pass on votes nearly 200 times since election—a sign of ‘unconvincing’ speakers, says Sen. Cools

Yea, nay, or I won’t say: when it comes to voting in the Upper Chamber, Senators have collectively chosen to abstain from votes 190 times since the last election, about two-and-a-half times per vote. The…


We’re offering 15% off a year-long subscription to the hill times online content.