Home Page News Opinion Foreign Policy Politics Policy Legislation Lobbying Hill Life & People Hill Climbers Heard On The Hill Calendar Archives Classifieds
Advertising Subscribe Reuse & Permissions
Hill Times Events Hill Times Books Hill Times Careers The Wire Report The Lobby Monitor Parliament Now

Raitt risks blood in her quest to sink the big fish

By Tim Powers      

By setting herself against O’Leary, she risks inflating his would-be candidacy. But she’s also conscious that if she doesn’t take some risks she has zero chance of winning.

If Lisa Raitt, pictured, can keep driving the narrative that Kevin O’Leary is a threat and she is best placed to deal with him then she might have a path to victory, writes Tim Powers. But it is a big 'if.' The Hill Times photograph by Jake Wright

OTTAWA—Lisa Raitt has gone shark fishing! As someone who grew up in the era of the epic Jaws films, she knows it can be a pretty bloody endeavour to catch the big fish, but well worth the glory if you do.

Last week, Raitt, who to date has had generally a quite uneventful Conservative leadership campaign, decided to go after Kevin O’Leary and to a lesser degree Kellie Leitch. Raitt had a news conference at the national press theatre in Ottawa during what is normally a sleepy post-Christmas/early new year time to announce the launch of the website StopKevinOLeary.com.

She said she was taking a stand against the “cheap talk” and “irresponsible populism” of would-be candidate O’Leary and current contender Leitch. She sees O’Leary and to a lesser degree Leitch as dangerous proponents of passing fads of pissed-off populism that over time could sink the Conservative Party.

Raitt clearly believes O’Leary is going to enter the race. She also sees a potential benefit in setting herself up as his main opponent. While other candidates like Andrew Scheer, Erin O’Toole, Michael Chong, and Maxime Bernier have criticized or challenged O’Leary on different matters, none have gone so far as Raitt to call for his defeat or perhaps scare him away from entering.

Raitt is no dummy. She knows by trying to harpoon O’Leary she can also inflate his candidacy and reinforce his disruptor image, which many Conservative voters might find appealing. But she also is conscious of the fact if she doesn’t take some risks she has zero chance of winning the Conservative race.

Given that 13 candidates still remain in the race (another fail for us pundits who thought more than one would drop out by Dec. 31), now is the time if you are still competing to do a serious review of what constitutes your winning conditions. While many of the 13 are still lining themselves up to be everyone’s second choice, Raitt seems to have stepped away from that configuration.

If Raitt can keep driving the narrative that O’Leary is a threat and she is best placed to deal with him then she might have a path to victory. But it is a big “if.”

Raitt knows her life story makes a good contrast to O’Leary’s. There aren’t, to the best of my knowledge, videos of Lisa Raitt referring to herself as Ms. Wonderful while opening a champagne bottle with a sabre. Raitt’s life with its ups and downs is more relatable to Canadians than O’Leary’s. Like O’Leary, she is a good communicator who is affable. She is also not a carbon copy of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, which matters. And ironically, like O’Leary, her French is a work in progress. If they were to engage in verbal fisticuffs both would likely downplay that commonality.

To land a shark, though, you have to get him to take the bait; so far, O’Leary hasn’t bitten. He and his team have made general comments in response to Raitt’s pronouncements, but they have not focused on sinking Raitt. They rightly commented that the one thing Lisa Raitt’s news conference has done is generate some energy into what has mostly been a lacklustre affair.

We are still nearly five months away from the Conservatives selecting a new leader. More blood is likely to be left on the floor as candidates try to assert themselves in the run-up to the May 27 vote. The pack of candidates trying to be everyone’s second choice is going to have to fragment a bit, as you can’t have 12 or 13 number 2s. Voters can only pick one. Campaign strategists will have their work cut out for them trying to differentiate themselves from their opponents and to do that in a well-timed manner that coincides with members’ voting periods.

There is also a psychological challenge both for the candidate and elector in the number 2 positioning strategy. If you are everybody’s consensus second choice, how then can you beat the Liberals’ and the NDP’s first-choice person? The mind games never end.

Tim Powers is vice-chairman of Summa Strategies and managing director of Abacus Data. He is a former adviser to Conservative political leaders.

The Hill Times

More in News

Sparks Street roof fire under control

By Shruti Shekar 4:37 PM ET
A fire at a commercial building on Sparks Street in downtown Ottawa prompted the closure of Metcalfe Street between Queen and Wellington streets on Thursday afternoon. Ottawa Fire Services responded to the fire on the…

MPs Ouellette, Jolibois call for federal role in preserving Indigenous languages

News|By Jolson Lim 4:16 PM ET
Robert-Falcon Ouellette and Georgina Jolibois are the latest MPs to call for the right to speak Indigenous languages in Parliament and have them properly translated into French and English, saying the federal government must assume an expanded…

NDP MP Erin Weir met with harassment investigator last week

NDP MP Erin Weir says he met with the person investigating harassment allegations against him for the first time last week, more than a month after the investigation started. The Saskatchewan MP said NDP caucus…

China to MPs: don’t blame us for dumping steel, we’re victims too

The Chinese Embassy in Canada has dismissed some MPs' comments about China dumping steel on North American markets as a “so-called” issue, saying it is also a victim of trade protectionism and is unfairly seen…

Feds shell out $250K to bureaucrats for Phoenix-related financial losses

News|By Emily Haws
The government has doled out nearly $250,000 since September 2016 to cover financial losses public servants have incurred because of the Phoenix pay system, according to the Treasury Board, which unions say indicates the program…

NDP too slow on Singh Sikh controversy, say strategists, but it’s not likely to hurt him in 2019

News|By Emily Haws
The NDP should have expected questions on leader Jagmeet Singh’s associations with Sikh nationalist or extremist groups, so it's surprising his team took so long to mount a defence when the issue blew up in…

Time to plug loopholes that make it ‘almost an invitation’ for foreign money to influence elections, Liberals, opposition agree

The Liberal government says it plans to introduce new rules to limit foreign influence and money in federal elections—action opposition Parliamentarians and political observers say is needed now before it turns into a real problem.…

After a year’s delay, justice minister called on to finally slay zombie laws

A government bill aiming to remove unconstitutional parts of the Criminal Code is barely lurching along, much to the chagrin of a Conservative MP and his constituent who could have seen a guilty verdict handed…

Defence minister denies funding lapse for ambitious policy amid project delays

Money for new defence policy projects is delayed, not discarded, Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan told a House committee Tuesday, putting some of the blame for slower spending on Stephen Harper-era cuts to the public service…


We’re offering 15% off a year-long subscription to the hill times online content.