Constitutional environmental protection: moving forward instead of backward

Canada is one of a shrinking minority of countries whose supreme law, the Constitution, is silent on the environment. Environmental rights and/or responsibilities are now found in the constitutions of more than 150 nations.

It’s the environment: David R. Boyd writes that Bills C-38 and C-45 would have been identified as unconstitutional by the Department of Justice and removed before these laws were introduced if Canada included environmental protection in its Constitution. Bills C-38 and C-45 substantially weakened the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, Navigable Waters Protection Act and the Fisheries Act, while also eliminating the Kyoto Protocol Implementation Act, he writes.Photograph courtesy of David R. Boyd

By David R. Boyd

PUBLISHED :Friday, Jan. 25, 2013 8:21 PM

If you are already a subscriber

Subscribe to The Hill Times

Subscribe to the digital and/or print editions and get instant access to The Hill Times online.

Quick Purchase

Purchase Story Issue in electronic format (PDF) for $5.00.